Future Projections and Uncertainties of CMIP6 for Hydrological Indicators and Their Discrepancies from CMIP5 over South Korea

被引:8
|
作者
Van Doi, Manh [1 ]
Kim, Jongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ulsan 44610, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
future projection; uncertainty quantification; uncertainty contribution; climatological mean; CMIP6; CMIP5; CLIMATE SYSTEM MODEL; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; BASIC EVALUATION; ENSEMBLE; VERSION; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; SCENARIOMIP; CHALLENGES; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3390/w14182926
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Future climate projections and their uncertainties affect many aspects of the world, so reliable assessments are essential for policymakers who need to prepare mitigation measures in the context of climate change. In this study, we examined the projected future climate and estimated uncertainty for South Korea using results from the global climate model (GCM), updated from the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6); we then compared the differences in outcome between the fifth and sixth phases of the CMIP (CMIP5 and CMIP6). Future projections were estimated as the averaged climatological mean (denoted as (C) over barM) for the four proposed hydrological indicators. Model uncertainty (UEMI) and stochastic uncertainty (USTO) were quantified as the range of ensembles of the climatological mean, while the emission uncertainty (UEMI) was estimated as the difference between the CM values of two emission scenarios. The following are the key findings of our study: (1) using an ensemble of multiple GCMs is recommended over using individual GCMs, and models in CMIP6 performed better for reproducing climate during the control period than models in the CMIP5; (2) the (C) over barM values in the CMIP6 increased for future periods, especially toward the end of this century, increasing mean temperature (meanTa) by approximately 5 degrees C, total precipitation (totPr), and daily maximum precipitation (maxDa) by about 20%, and these values were higher than those of the CMIP5; (3) the UGCM, USTO, and UEMI values increased for future periods in most of the indices; (4) the UGCM (for meanTa, totPr, and maxDa) and USTO (for totPr and maxDa) magnitudes in the CMIP6 were higher than those in the CMIP5, while the UEMI values between the two CMIPs were similar for all of the indices; (5) the UGCM was the major source of the largest uncertainty for meanTa, the USTO had a significant impact on future projections of totPr and maxDa, especially in the summer, and the UEMI became the dominant source of uncertainty for projecting the future meanTa, especially in the period farthest from the present. These results should provide useful information for studies that quantify future climate-induced hydrological impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [2] Spatiotemporal differences and uncertainties in projections of precipitation and temperature in South Korea from CMIP6 and CMIP5 general circulation models
    Song, Young Hoon
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (13) : 5899 - 5919
  • [3] Differences in multi-model ensembles of CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections for future droughts in South Korea
    Song, Young Hoon
    Shahi, Amsuddin
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 2688 - 2716
  • [4] Wind energy resource over Europe under CMIP6 future climate projections: What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Carvalho, D.
    Rocha, A.
    Costoya, X.
    DeCastro, M.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [5] A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
    Lei, Yawen
    Chen, Jie
    Xiong, Lihua
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03): : 330 - 347
  • [6] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [7] Evaluation and future projections of wind energy resources over the Northern Hemisphere in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Miao, Haozeyu
    Xu, Haiming
    Huang, Gang
    Yang, Kai
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 211 : 809 - 821
  • [8] Climate Model Projections for Canada: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Sobie, S. R.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Curry, C. L.
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2021, 59 (4-5) : 269 - 284
  • [9] The Mediterranean climate change hotspot in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections
    Cos, Josep
    Doblas-Reyes, Francisco
    Jury, Martin
    Marcos, Raul
    Bretonniere, Pierre-Antoine
    Samso, Margarida
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2022, 13 (01) : 321 - 340
  • [10] CMIP5 and CMIP6 Model Projection Comparison for Hydrological Impacts Over North America
    Martel, J-L
    Brissette, F.
    Troin, M.
    Arsenault, R.
    Chen, J.
    Su, T.
    Lucas-Picher, P.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (15)