Future Projections and Uncertainties of CMIP6 for Hydrological Indicators and Their Discrepancies from CMIP5 over South Korea

被引:8
|
作者
Van Doi, Manh [1 ]
Kim, Jongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ulsan 44610, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
future projection; uncertainty quantification; uncertainty contribution; climatological mean; CMIP6; CMIP5; CLIMATE SYSTEM MODEL; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; BASIC EVALUATION; ENSEMBLE; VERSION; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; SCENARIOMIP; CHALLENGES; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3390/w14182926
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Future climate projections and their uncertainties affect many aspects of the world, so reliable assessments are essential for policymakers who need to prepare mitigation measures in the context of climate change. In this study, we examined the projected future climate and estimated uncertainty for South Korea using results from the global climate model (GCM), updated from the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6); we then compared the differences in outcome between the fifth and sixth phases of the CMIP (CMIP5 and CMIP6). Future projections were estimated as the averaged climatological mean (denoted as (C) over barM) for the four proposed hydrological indicators. Model uncertainty (UEMI) and stochastic uncertainty (USTO) were quantified as the range of ensembles of the climatological mean, while the emission uncertainty (UEMI) was estimated as the difference between the CM values of two emission scenarios. The following are the key findings of our study: (1) using an ensemble of multiple GCMs is recommended over using individual GCMs, and models in CMIP6 performed better for reproducing climate during the control period than models in the CMIP5; (2) the (C) over barM values in the CMIP6 increased for future periods, especially toward the end of this century, increasing mean temperature (meanTa) by approximately 5 degrees C, total precipitation (totPr), and daily maximum precipitation (maxDa) by about 20%, and these values were higher than those of the CMIP5; (3) the UGCM, USTO, and UEMI values increased for future periods in most of the indices; (4) the UGCM (for meanTa, totPr, and maxDa) and USTO (for totPr and maxDa) magnitudes in the CMIP6 were higher than those in the CMIP5, while the UEMI values between the two CMIPs were similar for all of the indices; (5) the UGCM was the major source of the largest uncertainty for meanTa, the USTO had a significant impact on future projections of totPr and maxDa, especially in the summer, and the UEMI became the dominant source of uncertainty for projecting the future meanTa, especially in the period farthest from the present. These results should provide useful information for studies that quantify future climate-induced hydrological impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heat wave magnitude over India under changing climate: Projections from CMIP5 and CMIP6 experiments
    Das, Jew
    Umamahesh, Nanduri Venkata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (01) : 331 - 351
  • [22] Uncertainties in evapotranspiration projections associated with estimation methods and CMIP6 GCMs for South Korea
    Song, Young Hoon
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [23] Present-day and future climate over central and South America according to CMIP5/CMIP6 models
    Ortega, Geusep
    Arias, Paola A.
    Villegas, Juan Camilo
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    Nobre, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (15) : 6713 - 6735
  • [24] A Performance Evaluation of Potential Intensity over the Tropical Cyclone Passage to South Korea Simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Park, Doo-Sun R.
    Kim, Hyeong-Seog
    Kwon, Minho
    Byun, Young-Hwa
    Kim, Maeng-Ki
    Chung, Il-Ung
    Park, Jeong-Soo
    Min, Seung-Ki
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (09)
  • [25] Evapotranspiration Partitioning in CMIP5 Models: Uncertainties and Future Projections
    Berg, Alexis
    Sheffield, Justin
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2019, 32 (10) : 2653 - 2671
  • [26] How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming
    D. Carvalho
    S. Rafael
    A. Monteiro
    V. Rodrigues
    M. Lopes
    A. Rocha
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [27] CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6
    Stouffer, R. J.
    Eyring, V.
    Meehl, G. A.
    Bony, S.
    Senior, C.
    Stevens, B.
    Taylor, K. E.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (01) : 95 - +
  • [28] Future changes of global potential evapotranspiration simulated from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models
    Liu, Xinlei
    Li, Chunxiang
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Han, Lin
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 568 - 575
  • [29] How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming
    Carvalho, D.
    Rafael, S.
    Monteiro, A.
    Rodrigues, V.
    Lopes, M.
    Rocha, A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] Evaluation and projections of surface air temperature over the Tibetan Plateau from CMIP6 and CMIP5: warming trend and uncertainty
    Minpei Zhou
    Zhongbo Yu
    Huanghe Gu
    Qin Ju
    Yiyan Gao
    Lei Wen
    Tangkai Huang
    Wei Wang
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 60 : 3863 - 3883