Future Projections and Uncertainties of CMIP6 for Hydrological Indicators and Their Discrepancies from CMIP5 over South Korea

被引:8
|
作者
Van Doi, Manh [1 ]
Kim, Jongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ulsan 44610, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
future projection; uncertainty quantification; uncertainty contribution; climatological mean; CMIP6; CMIP5; CLIMATE SYSTEM MODEL; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; BASIC EVALUATION; ENSEMBLE; VERSION; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; SCENARIOMIP; CHALLENGES; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3390/w14182926
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Future climate projections and their uncertainties affect many aspects of the world, so reliable assessments are essential for policymakers who need to prepare mitigation measures in the context of climate change. In this study, we examined the projected future climate and estimated uncertainty for South Korea using results from the global climate model (GCM), updated from the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6); we then compared the differences in outcome between the fifth and sixth phases of the CMIP (CMIP5 and CMIP6). Future projections were estimated as the averaged climatological mean (denoted as (C) over barM) for the four proposed hydrological indicators. Model uncertainty (UEMI) and stochastic uncertainty (USTO) were quantified as the range of ensembles of the climatological mean, while the emission uncertainty (UEMI) was estimated as the difference between the CM values of two emission scenarios. The following are the key findings of our study: (1) using an ensemble of multiple GCMs is recommended over using individual GCMs, and models in CMIP6 performed better for reproducing climate during the control period than models in the CMIP5; (2) the (C) over barM values in the CMIP6 increased for future periods, especially toward the end of this century, increasing mean temperature (meanTa) by approximately 5 degrees C, total precipitation (totPr), and daily maximum precipitation (maxDa) by about 20%, and these values were higher than those of the CMIP5; (3) the UGCM, USTO, and UEMI values increased for future periods in most of the indices; (4) the UGCM (for meanTa, totPr, and maxDa) and USTO (for totPr and maxDa) magnitudes in the CMIP6 were higher than those in the CMIP5, while the UEMI values between the two CMIPs were similar for all of the indices; (5) the UGCM was the major source of the largest uncertainty for meanTa, the USTO had a significant impact on future projections of totPr and maxDa, especially in the summer, and the UEMI became the dominant source of uncertainty for projecting the future meanTa, especially in the period farthest from the present. These results should provide useful information for studies that quantify future climate-induced hydrological impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CMIP5 climate change projections for hydrological modelling in South Asia
    Zheng, Hongxing
    Chiew, Francis H. S.
    Charles, Steve
    21ST INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2015), 2015, : 2409 - 2415
  • [42] A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran
    Zamani, Yasin
    Hashemi Monfared, Seyed Arman
    Azhdari Moghaddam, Mehdi
    Hamidianpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 142 (3-4) : 1613 - 1623
  • [43] Regional Dynamic Sea Level Simulated in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models: Mean Biases, Future Projections, and Their Linkages
    Lyu, Kewei
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Church, John A.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (15) : 6377 - 6398
  • [44] Blocking Simulations in GFDL GCMs for CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Liu, Ping
    Reed, Kevin A.
    Garner, Stephen T.
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhu, Yuejian
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (15) : 5053 - 5070
  • [45] Performance Evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models on Heatwaves in Korea and Associated Teleconnection Patterns
    Kim, Maeng-Ki
    Yu, Dae-Geun
    Oh, Ji-Seon
    Byun, Young-Hwa
    Boo, Kyung-On
    Chung, Il-Ung
    Park, Jeong-Soo
    Park, Doo-Sun R.
    Min, Seung-Ki
    Sung, Hyun Min
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2020, 125 (23)
  • [46] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [47] Evaluating Diurnal Rainfall Signal Performance from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Lee, Yu-Chi
    Wang, Yi-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (18) : 7607 - 7623
  • [48] Customized Statistically Downscaled CMIP5 and CMIP6 Projections: Application in the Edwards Aquifer Region in South-Central Texas
    Wootten, A. M.
    Basagaoglu, H.
    Bertetti, F. P.
    Chakraborty, D.
    Sharma, C.
    Samimi, M.
    Mirchi, A.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [49] Model uncertainties in climate change impacts on Sahel precipitation in ensembles of CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations
    Monerie, Paul-Arthur
    Wainwright, Caroline M.
    Sidibe, Moussa
    Akinsanola, Akintomide Afolayan
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 (5-6) : 1385 - 1401
  • [50] Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble
    Erika Coppola
    Francesca Raffaele
    Filippo Giorgi
    Graziano Giuliani
    Gao Xuejie
    James M. Ciarlo
    Taleena Rae Sines
    José Abraham Torres-Alavez
    Sushant Das
    Fabio di Sante
    Emanuela Pichelli
    Russell Glazer
    Sebastian Karl Müller
    Sabina Abba Omar
    Moetasim Ashfaq
    Melissa Bukovsky
    E.-S. Im
    Daniela Jacob
    Claas Teichmann
    Armelle Remedio
    Thomas Remke
    Arne Kriegsmann
    Katharina Bülow
    Torsten Weber
    Lars Buntemeyer
    Kevin Sieck
    Diana Rechid
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 57 : 1293 - 1383