Guidelines for expert opinions

被引：0

作者：

Schneider, Wolfgang ^{[1
]}

Becker, Daniela ^{[1
]}

Dohrenbusch, Ralf ^{[2
]}

Freyberger, Harald J. ^{[3
]}

Guendel, Harald ^{[4
]}

Henningsen, Peter ^{[5
]}

Kowalewsky, Sonja ^{[3
]}

Koellner, Volker ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Rostock, Zentrum Nervenheilkunde, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapeut Med, D-18147 Rostock, Germany

[2] Univ Bonn, Abt Methodenlehre & Diagnost, D-5300 Bonn, Germany

[3] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Univ Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Greifswald, Germany

[4] Univ Ulm Klinikum, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Ulm, Germany

[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany

[6] Univ Saarland, Blieskastel & Med Fak, Fachklin Psychosomat Med, Mediclin Bliestal Kliniken, Homburg, Germany

来源：

PSYCHOTHERAPEUT | 2010年 / 55卷 / 05期

关键词：

Expert opinion; International Classification of Functioning; Diagnostic level; Activity; Participation; STANDARDS;

D O I：

10.1007/s00278-010-0763-6

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The article presents an operationalized and manualized approach for the assessment of the capability of performance. This manual has been conceptualized and tested empirically by a multicentric and interdisciplinary workgroup. It is basically oriented to the "International Classification of Functioning" (ICF; WHO), which is well accepted for assessing the course of chronic diseases and the consequences for the individual. It is especially widely applied in the context of rehabilitation. The different diagnostic levels of the manual and their operationalization are outlined. Furthermore, the first results concerning reliability, content validity, applicability and practicability are described and questions on the areas of application of the instrument are discussed.

引用

页码：380 / 388

页数：9

共 50 条

[41] OHIO COURT ALLOWS EXPERT OPINIONS
不详
TRIAL, 1986, 22 (11): : 96 - 96
[42] Glasses as Relevant Factor in Expert Opinions
Burggraf, M. H.
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2018, 235 (02) : 202 - 204
[43] Contesting Confessions: Opinions of Expert Witnesses
Kaplan, Jeffrey
Lundy, Jessica
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024,
[44] Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risk
Nikolopoulos, K
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2004, 20 (01) : 143 - 144
[45] The analysis of expert opinions' consensus quality
Kozierkiewicz-Hetmanska, Adrianna
INFORMATION FUSION, 2017, 34 : 80 - 86
[46] Guidelines for the preparation of closing opinions
Glazer, DW
Weise, SO
BUSINESS LAWYER, 2001, 57 (01): : 345 - 354
[47] DIVISION OF LABOR IN RENDERING EXPERT OPINIONS
KOHLHAAS, M
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1969, 94 (05) : 237 - &
[48] "EXPERT OPINIONS" (formerly known as "Debates")
不详
PLASMA PROCESSES AND POLYMERS, 2016, 13 (12) : 1212 - 1212
[49] Aspects of expert opinions of avulsion fractures
Schroeter, F.
ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (03): : 242 - 248
[50] RFBR: Opinions of Expert Science Theorists
Kuznetsova, Tatiana
Dezhina, Irina
ACTA NATURAE, 2010, 2 (01): : 17 - 17

← 1 2 3 4 5 →