Guidelines for expert opinions

被引：0

作者：

Schneider, Wolfgang ^{[1
]}

Becker, Daniela ^{[1
]}

Dohrenbusch, Ralf ^{[2
]}

Freyberger, Harald J. ^{[3
]}

Guendel, Harald ^{[4
]}

Henningsen, Peter ^{[5
]}

Kowalewsky, Sonja ^{[3
]}

Koellner, Volker ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Rostock, Zentrum Nervenheilkunde, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapeut Med, D-18147 Rostock, Germany

[2] Univ Bonn, Abt Methodenlehre & Diagnost, D-5300 Bonn, Germany

[3] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Univ Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Greifswald, Germany

[4] Univ Ulm Klinikum, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Ulm, Germany

[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany

[6] Univ Saarland, Blieskastel & Med Fak, Fachklin Psychosomat Med, Mediclin Bliestal Kliniken, Homburg, Germany

来源：

PSYCHOTHERAPEUT | 2010年 / 55卷 / 05期

关键词：

Expert opinion; International Classification of Functioning; Diagnostic level; Activity; Participation; STANDARDS;

D O I：

10.1007/s00278-010-0763-6

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The article presents an operationalized and manualized approach for the assessment of the capability of performance. This manual has been conceptualized and tested empirically by a multicentric and interdisciplinary workgroup. It is basically oriented to the "International Classification of Functioning" (ICF; WHO), which is well accepted for assessing the course of chronic diseases and the consequences for the individual. It is especially widely applied in the context of rehabilitation. The different diagnostic levels of the manual and their operationalization are outlined. Furthermore, the first results concerning reliability, content validity, applicability and practicability are described and questions on the areas of application of the instrument are discussed.

引用

页码：380 / 388

页数：9

共 50 条

[21] EXPERT MEDICAL OPINIONS IN COURT
RIEGER, HJ
[J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1973, 98 (04) : 176 - 176
[22] Synopsis of Expert Opinions and Conclusions
Skolnick, Phil
White, David
Acri, Jane B.
[J]. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2015, 14 (06) : 773 - 776
[23] The future of DGMKG expert opinions
Heufelder, M.
Hoffmann, J.
[J]. MKG-CHIRURG, 2019, 12 (03): : 140 - 142
[24] Utilization of foreign Expert Opinions
Luckey, J.
[J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2012, 45 (07): : 511 - 511
[25] EXPERT MEDICAL OPINIONS - INTRODUCTION
KURZINGER
[J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE MEDIZIN-ZKM, 1990, 45 (12): : 1012 - 1012
[26] Balance of opinions in expert panels
Gong, Qiang
Yang, Huanxing
[J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 170 : 151 - 154
[27] Expert opinions on the APAP - Conclusion
Guelfi, J. D.
[J]. ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2009, : S123 - S124
[28] Medizinische GutachtenMedical expert opinions
Andreas J. Gross
C. Süfke
H. Schülke
M. Lindemann
[J]. Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, 2023, 82 (9) : 776 - 783
[29] Resolving differing expert opinions
Montani, Isabelle
Marquis, Raymond
Anthonioz, Nicole Egli
Champod, Christophe
[J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2019, 59 (01) : 1 - 8
[30] Some expert opinions on the Internet
Dern, DP
[J]. COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 1996, 33 (04): : 53 - 53

← 1 2 3 4 5 →