Guidelines for expert opinions

被引:0
|
作者
Schneider, Wolfgang [1 ]
Becker, Daniela [1 ]
Dohrenbusch, Ralf [2 ]
Freyberger, Harald J. [3 ]
Guendel, Harald [4 ]
Henningsen, Peter [5 ]
Kowalewsky, Sonja [3 ]
Koellner, Volker [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Zentrum Nervenheilkunde, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapeut Med, D-18147 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Abt Methodenlehre & Diagnost, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[3] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Univ Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Greifswald, Germany
[4] Univ Ulm Klinikum, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Ulm, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat & Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Saarland, Blieskastel & Med Fak, Fachklin Psychosomat Med, Mediclin Bliestal Kliniken, Homburg, Germany
来源
PSYCHOTHERAPEUT | 2010年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词
Expert opinion; International Classification of Functioning; Diagnostic level; Activity; Participation; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00278-010-0763-6
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The article presents an operationalized and manualized approach for the assessment of the capability of performance. This manual has been conceptualized and tested empirically by a multicentric and interdisciplinary workgroup. It is basically oriented to the "International Classification of Functioning" (ICF; WHO), which is well accepted for assessing the course of chronic diseases and the consequences for the individual. It is especially widely applied in the context of rehabilitation. The different diagnostic levels of the manual and their operationalization are outlined. Furthermore, the first results concerning reliability, content validity, applicability and practicability are described and questions on the areas of application of the instrument are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 388
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The future of DGMKG expert opinions
    Heufelder, M.
    Hoffmann, J.
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2019, 12 (03): : 140 - 142
  • [32] Recommendations For Expert Opinions by the DGUV
    Haider, E.
    Raab, W.
    TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2010, 12 (04) : 221 - 222
  • [33] Expert opinions put to the test
    Campbell, GA
    ABA JOURNAL, 1998, 84 : 32 - 32
  • [34] Medizinische GutachtenMedical expert opinions
    Andreas J. Gross
    C. Süfke
    H. Schülke
    M. Lindemann
    Die Urologie, 2023, 62 (3) : 305 - 312
  • [35] Experience with expert opinions (and experts)
    Will, C.
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2013, 6 (04): : 269 - 274
  • [36] Indebtedness through Expert Opinions
    Kroeber, Hans-Ludwig
    FORENSISCHE PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE KRIMINOLOGIE, 2014, 8 (03) : 224 - 225
  • [37] CONVERGING CONFIDENCE OF EXPERT OPINIONS
    Hart, Gary C.
    King, Stephanie A.
    Hortacsu, Ayse
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2009, 18 (02): : 171 - 179
  • [38] Hip arthroscopy protocol: expert opinions on post-operative weight bearing and return to sports guidelines
    Rath, Ehud
    Sharfman, Zachary T.
    Paret, Matan
    Amar, Eyal
    Drexler, Michael
    Bonin, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2017, 4 (01): : 60 - 66
  • [39] Recommendations for expert opinions about predictions: Empirically based recommendations for forensic expert opinions on legal prognosis
    Kroeber, Hans-Ludwig
    Brettel, Hauke
    Rettenberger, Martin
    Stuebner, Susanne
    FORENSISCHE PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE KRIMINOLOGIE, 2019, 13 (04) : 334 - 342
  • [40] Recommendations for expert opinions about predictions: Legal framework for expert opinions about predictions in criminal proceedings
    Boetticher, Axel
    Koller, Matthias
    Boehm, Klaus Michael
    Brettel, Hauke
    Doelling, Dieter
    Hoeffler, Katrin
    Mueller-Metz, Reinhard
    Pfister, Wolfgang
    Schneider, Ursula
    Schoech, Heinz
    Wolf, Thomas
    FORENSISCHE PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE KRIMINOLOGIE, 2019, 13 (04) : 305 - 333