Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN)

被引:6
|
作者
Bellini, Davide [1 ,2 ]
De Santis, Domenico [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Damiano [1 ,2 ]
Rengo, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ferrari, Riccardo [3 ]
Biondi, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Laghi, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SAPIENZA Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[2] ICOT Hosp, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, I-04100 Latina, Italy
[3] San Camillo Forlanini Hosp, Dept Emergency Radiol, Rome, Italy
关键词
CT colonography; Bowel preparation; Dietary restriction; Randomised trial; Patient tolerance; IMAGE QUALITY; CATHARTIC PREPARATION; PATIENT EXPERIENCE; COLONOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-4997-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To investigate whether diet restriction affects quality of colon cleansing and patient tolerance during reduced bowel preparation for CT colonography (CTC). Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were enrolled in this pragmatic, single-centre, randomised trial. All patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio, blocks of ten) to receive a reduced bowel preparation and faecal tagging with (Diet-Restriction-Group [DR]) or without (No-Diet-Restriction-Group [NDR]) dietary restriction. Five readers performed a blinded subjective image analysis, by means of 4-point Likert-scales from 0 (highest score) to 3 (worst score). Endpoints were the quality of large bowel cleansing and tolerance to the assigned bowel preparation regimen. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (URomLSDBAL1). Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to treatments (48 in NDR-group, 47 in DR-group). Both groups resulted in optimal colon cleansing. The mean residual stool (0.22, 95%CI 0.00-0.44) and fluid burden (0.39, 95%CI 0.25-0.53) scores for patients in DR-group were similar to those in patients in NDR-group (0.25, 95%CI 0.03-0.47 [p = 0.82] and 0.49, 95%CI 0.30-0.67 [p = 0.38], respectively). Tolerance was significantly better in NDR-group. A reduced bowel preparation in association with faecal tagging and without any dietary restriction demonstrated optimal colon cleansing effectiveness for CTC, providing better patient compliance compared with dietary restriction. aEuro cent Dietary restriction in reduced bowel preparation regimen can be avoided. aEuro cent The quality of colon cleansing is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent The quality of faecal tagging is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent Avoidance of dietary restriction improves patients' tolerance for CTC.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy
    Meric, Kaan
    Bakal, Nuray
    Aydin, Sibel
    Yesil, Atakan
    Tekesin, Kemal
    Simsek, Masum
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 33 (06) : 329 - 335
  • [42] Is bowel preparation before excretory urography necessary? A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Guo, HF
    Huang, Y
    Xi, ZJ
    Song, Y
    Guo, YL
    Na, YQ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02): : 665 - 668
  • [43] Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy
    Kaan Meric
    Nuray Bakal
    Sibel Aydin
    Atakan Yesil
    Kemal Tekesin
    Masum Simsek
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2015, 33 : 329 - 335
  • [44] Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-ml and 90-ml doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation prior to CT colonography
    Hinshaw, JL
    Taylor, AJ
    Jones, DA
    Pickhardt, PJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 20 - 20
  • [45] Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy
    Pinfield, A
    Stringer, MD
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1999, 80 (02) : 181 - 183
  • [46] A MEDITERRANEAN DIET IS FEASIBLE IN PATIENTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME: A PILOT RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Staudacher, Heidi M.
    Mahoney, Sophie
    Canale, Kim
    So, Daniel
    Loughman, Amy
    Opie, Rachelle
    Beswick, Lauren
    Hair, Chris
    Jacka, Felice
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1059 - S1059
  • [47] Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment
    Ghanouni, Alex
    Halligan, Steve
    Taylor, Stuart A.
    Boone, Darren
    Plumb, Andrew
    Stoffel, Sandro
    Morris, Stephen
    Yao, Guiqing Lily
    Zhu, Shihua
    Lilford, Richard
    Wardle, Jane
    von Wagner, Christian
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (04):
  • [48] Electronic Cleansing for 24-H Limited Bowel Preparation CT Colonography Using Principal Curvature Flow
    van Ravesteijn, Vincent F.
    Boellaard, Thierry N.
    van der Paardt, Marije P.
    Serlie, Iwo W. O.
    de Haan, Margriet C.
    Stoker, Jaap
    van Vliet, Lucas J.
    Vos, Frans M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 (11) : 3036 - 3045
  • [49] Blinded randomised trial of efficacy, acceptance and adherence of standard bowel preparation of "glycoprep" and "fleet" versus "colocap balance™" in bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Tallis, C.
    Boyd, P.
    Ombiga, J.
    Terry, S.
    O'Rourke, P.
    Chin, B.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 : A254 - A254
  • [50] Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial
    Vecchi, Maurizio
    Tontini, Gian Eugenio
    Fiori, Giancarla
    Bocus, Paolo
    Carnovali, Marino
    Cesaro, Paola
    Costamagna, Guido
    Di Paolo, Dhanai
    Elli, Luca
    Fedorishina, Olga
    Hinkel, Carsten
    Jakobs, Ralf
    Kashin, Sergey
    Magnoli, Michela
    Manes, Gianpiero
    Melnikova, Ekaterina
    Orsatti, Anna
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Prada, Alberto
    Radaelli, Franco
    Sferrazza, Sandro
    Soru, Pietro
    Valats, Jean Christophe
    Veselov, Victor
    Spada, Cristiano
    Uebel, Peter
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2025, 57 (02) : 574 - 583