Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN)

被引:6
|
作者
Bellini, Davide [1 ,2 ]
De Santis, Domenico [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Damiano [1 ,2 ]
Rengo, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ferrari, Riccardo [3 ]
Biondi, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Laghi, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SAPIENZA Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[2] ICOT Hosp, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, I-04100 Latina, Italy
[3] San Camillo Forlanini Hosp, Dept Emergency Radiol, Rome, Italy
关键词
CT colonography; Bowel preparation; Dietary restriction; Randomised trial; Patient tolerance; IMAGE QUALITY; CATHARTIC PREPARATION; PATIENT EXPERIENCE; COLONOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-4997-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To investigate whether diet restriction affects quality of colon cleansing and patient tolerance during reduced bowel preparation for CT colonography (CTC). Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were enrolled in this pragmatic, single-centre, randomised trial. All patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio, blocks of ten) to receive a reduced bowel preparation and faecal tagging with (Diet-Restriction-Group [DR]) or without (No-Diet-Restriction-Group [NDR]) dietary restriction. Five readers performed a blinded subjective image analysis, by means of 4-point Likert-scales from 0 (highest score) to 3 (worst score). Endpoints were the quality of large bowel cleansing and tolerance to the assigned bowel preparation regimen. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (URomLSDBAL1). Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to treatments (48 in NDR-group, 47 in DR-group). Both groups resulted in optimal colon cleansing. The mean residual stool (0.22, 95%CI 0.00-0.44) and fluid burden (0.39, 95%CI 0.25-0.53) scores for patients in DR-group were similar to those in patients in NDR-group (0.25, 95%CI 0.03-0.47 [p = 0.82] and 0.49, 95%CI 0.30-0.67 [p = 0.38], respectively). Tolerance was significantly better in NDR-group. A reduced bowel preparation in association with faecal tagging and without any dietary restriction demonstrated optimal colon cleansing effectiveness for CTC, providing better patient compliance compared with dietary restriction. aEuro cent Dietary restriction in reduced bowel preparation regimen can be avoided. aEuro cent The quality of colon cleansing is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent The quality of faecal tagging is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent Avoidance of dietary restriction improves patients' tolerance for CTC.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bowel preparation in CT colonography: electrolyte and renal function disturbances in the frail and elderly patient
    Patrick Mc Laughlin
    Joseph Eustace
    Sean Mc Sweeney
    Sebastian Mc Williams
    Kevin O’Regan
    Michael O’Connor
    Denis Kelly
    Michael M. Maher
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 604 - 612
  • [32] Diet restriction is not mandatory with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate based bowel preparation
    Kargin, Suleyman
    Kargin, Nisa Cetin
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04): : 388 - 391
  • [33] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population
    Liedenbaum, Marjolein H.
    de Vries, Ayso H.
    van Rijn, Anne F.
    Dekker, Helena M.
    Willemssen, Francois E. J. A.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    van Marrewijk, Corine J.
    Fockens, Paul
    Bipat, Shandra
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Stoker, Jaap
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (06): : 661 - 668
  • [34] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population
    Marjolein H. Liedenbaum
    Ayso H. de Vries
    Anne F. van Rijn
    Helena M. Dekker
    François E. J. A. Willemssen
    Monique E. van Leerdam
    Corine J. van Marrewijk
    Paul Fockens
    Shandra Bipat
    Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
    Evelien Dekker
    Jaap Stoker
    Abdominal Imaging, 2010, 35 : 661 - 668
  • [35] Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens
    F. Iafrate
    M. Iannitti
    M. Ciolina
    P. Baldassari
    A. Pichi
    A. Laghi
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 203 - 210
  • [36] Objective and Subjective Intrapatient Comparison of Iohexol Versus Diatrizoate for Bowel Preparation Quality at CT Colonography
    Johnson, Brandon
    Hinshaw, J. Louis
    Robbins, Jessica B.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (06) : 1202 - 1207
  • [37] Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens
    Iafrate, F.
    Iannitti, M.
    Ciolina, M.
    Baldassari, P.
    Pichi, A.
    Laghi, A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 203 - 210
  • [38] Preoperative bowel preparation versus no preparation before spinal surgery: A randomised clinical trial
    Olsen, Unni
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Bjork, Ida Torunn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2016, 23 : 3 - 13
  • [39] Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial
    Contant, Caroline M. E.
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    van 't Sant, Hans Pieter
    Oostvogel, Henk J. M.
    Smeets, Harm J.
    Stassen, Laurents P. S.
    Neijenhuis, Peter A.
    Idenburg, Floris J.
    Dijkhuis, Cees M.
    Heres, Piet
    van Tets, Willem F.
    Gerritsen, Jos J. G. M.
    Weidema, Wibo F.
    LANCET, 2007, 370 (9605): : 2112 - 2117
  • [40] Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme
    Regge, Daniele
    Iussich, Gabriella
    Segnan, Nereo
    Correale, Loredana
    Hassan, Cesare
    Arrigoni, Arrigo
    Asnaghi, Roberto
    Bestagini, Piero
    Bulighin, Gianmarco
    Cassinis, Maria Carla
    Ederle, Andrea
    Ferraris, Andrea
    Galatola, Giovanni
    Gallo, Teresa
    Gandini, Giovanni
    Garretti, Licia
    Martina, Maria Cristina
    Molinar, Daniela
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Morra, Lia
    Motton, Massimiliano
    Occhipinti, Pietro
    Pinali, Lucia
    Soardi, Gian Alberto
    Senore, Carlo
    GUT, 2017, 66 (08) : 1434 - 1440