Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN)

被引:6
|
作者
Bellini, Davide [1 ,2 ]
De Santis, Domenico [1 ,2 ]
Caruso, Damiano [1 ,2 ]
Rengo, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ferrari, Riccardo [3 ]
Biondi, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Laghi, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SAPIENZA Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[2] ICOT Hosp, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, I-04100 Latina, Italy
[3] San Camillo Forlanini Hosp, Dept Emergency Radiol, Rome, Italy
关键词
CT colonography; Bowel preparation; Dietary restriction; Randomised trial; Patient tolerance; IMAGE QUALITY; CATHARTIC PREPARATION; PATIENT EXPERIENCE; COLONOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-4997-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To investigate whether diet restriction affects quality of colon cleansing and patient tolerance during reduced bowel preparation for CT colonography (CTC). Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were enrolled in this pragmatic, single-centre, randomised trial. All patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio, blocks of ten) to receive a reduced bowel preparation and faecal tagging with (Diet-Restriction-Group [DR]) or without (No-Diet-Restriction-Group [NDR]) dietary restriction. Five readers performed a blinded subjective image analysis, by means of 4-point Likert-scales from 0 (highest score) to 3 (worst score). Endpoints were the quality of large bowel cleansing and tolerance to the assigned bowel preparation regimen. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (URomLSDBAL1). Ninety-five patients were randomly allocated to treatments (48 in NDR-group, 47 in DR-group). Both groups resulted in optimal colon cleansing. The mean residual stool (0.22, 95%CI 0.00-0.44) and fluid burden (0.39, 95%CI 0.25-0.53) scores for patients in DR-group were similar to those in patients in NDR-group (0.25, 95%CI 0.03-0.47 [p = 0.82] and 0.49, 95%CI 0.30-0.67 [p = 0.38], respectively). Tolerance was significantly better in NDR-group. A reduced bowel preparation in association with faecal tagging and without any dietary restriction demonstrated optimal colon cleansing effectiveness for CTC, providing better patient compliance compared with dietary restriction. aEuro cent Dietary restriction in reduced bowel preparation regimen can be avoided. aEuro cent The quality of colon cleansing is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent The quality of faecal tagging is not affected by dietary restriction. aEuro cent Avoidance of dietary restriction improves patients' tolerance for CTC.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of a novel bowel preparation method using laxative tablets for CT colonography
    Hattori, Masashi
    Katayama, Makoto
    Yamasaki, Michihiro
    Nonogaki, Hidehiko
    Yanase, Tadahiko
    Suematsu, Seiji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 76 - 76
  • [22] Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: Effect of Citramag and Picolax
    Taylor, SA
    Halligan, S
    Goh, V
    Morley, S
    Atkin, W
    Bartram, CI
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (09) : 723 - 732
  • [23] Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
    Maghsoudi, Hossein
    Bonahi, Seyed Saeid Mohammady
    Tehrani, Sadra Samavarchi
    Maniati, Mahmood
    Maniati, Mohammad Saeed
    Taheri, Hassan
    Savadkouhi, Shahryar
    Qujeq, Durdi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (06)
  • [24] Comparison of Bowel Preparation Quality between Clear-liquid Diet and No Diet Restriction
    Jeong, Woo Shin
    Park, Dong Il
    Seok, Hyo Sun
    Kim, Seong Eun
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2012, 10 (03) : 272 - 279
  • [25] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation
    Sebastiaan Jensch
    Shandra Bipat
    Jan Peringa
    Ayso H. de Vries
    Anneke Heutinck
    Evelien Dekker
    Lubbertus C. Baak
    Alexander D. Montauban van Swijndregt
    Jaap Stoker
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 146 - 156
  • [26] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation
    Jensch, Sebastiaan
    Bipat, Shandra
    Peringa, Jan
    de Vries, Ayso H.
    Heutinck, Anneke
    Dekker, Evelien
    Baak, Lubbertus C.
    van Swijndregt, Alexander D. Montauban
    Stoker, Jaap
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [27] Bowel preparation for screening CT colonography in a population with a high-residue diet: comparison of polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium phosphate
    Kim, Y. S.
    Kim, S. H.
    Park, M. J.
    Lim, S. H.
    Eun, H. W.
    Kim, S. Y.
    Chung, S. J.
    Song, I. S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 23 : A111 - A111
  • [28] CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: Performance characteristics in an increased-risk population
    Jensch, Sebastiaan
    De Vries, Ayso H.
    Peringa, Jan
    Bipat, Shandra
    Dekker, Evelien
    Baak, Lubbertus C.
    Bartelsman, Joep F.
    Heutinck, Anneke
    van Swijndregt, Alexander D. Montauban
    Stoker, Jaap
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (01) : 122 - 132
  • [29] Bowel Preparation for CT Colonography: Blinded Comparison of Magnesium Citrate and Sodium Phosphate for Catharsis
    Borden, Zachary S.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Kim, David H.
    Lubner, Meghan G.
    Agriantonis, Demetrios J.
    Hinshaw, J. Louis
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (01) : 138 - 144
  • [30] Bowel preparation in CT colonography: electrolyte and renal function disturbances in the frail and elderly patient
    Mc Laughlin, Patrick
    Eustace, Joseph
    Mc Sweeney, Sean
    Mc Williams, Sebastian
    O'Regan, Kevin
    O'Connor, Michael
    Kelly, Denis
    Maher, Michael M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 604 - 612