What (or Who) Is Public? Privacy Settings and Social Media Content Sharing

被引:40
|
作者
Fiesler, Casey [1 ]
Dye, Michaelanne [2 ]
Feuston, Jessica L. [3 ]
Hiruncharoenvate, Chaya [2 ]
Hutto, C. J. [2 ]
Morrison, Shannon [4 ]
Roshan, Parisa Khanipour [2 ]
Pavalanathan, Umashanthi [2 ]
Bruckman, Amy S. [2 ]
De Choudhury, Munmun [2 ]
Gilbert, Eric [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Syracuse Univ, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
privacy; content analysis; Facebook; dataset; machine learning; Mechanical Turk; mixed methods; prediction; research methods; social media; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1145/2998181.2998223
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
When social networking sites give users granular control over their privacy settings, the result is that some content across the site is public and some is not. How might this content-or characteristics of users who post publicly versus to a limited audience-be different? If these differences exist, research studies of public content could potentially be introducing systematic bias. Via Mechanical Turk, we asked 1,815 Facebook users to share recent posts. Using qualitative coding and quantitative measures, we characterize and categorize the nature of the content. Using machine learning techniques, we analyze patterns of choices for privacy settings. Contrary to expectations, we find that content type is not a significant predictor of privacy setting; however, some demographics such as gender and age are predictive. Additionally, with consent of participants, we provide a dataset of nearly 9,000 public and non-public Facebook posts.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 580
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social Media Networking Literacy: Rebalancing Sharing, Privacy, and Legal Observance
    Gathegi, John N.
    INFORMATION LITERACY: LIFELONG LEARNING AND DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2014, 492 : 101 - 108
  • [22] Social media networking literacy: Rebalancing sharing, privacy, and legal observance
    Gathegi, John N. (jgathegi@usf.edu), 1600, Springer Verlag (492):
  • [23] "We Are the Product": Public Reactions to Online Data Sharing and Privacy Controversies in the Media
    Fiesler, Casey
    Hallinan, Blake
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [24] The role of human behaviour in activist content sharing on social media
    Sinha, Ekta
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2024, 48 (06) : 1216 - 1232
  • [25] Who, What, Why: Examining Annotations in Mobile Content Sharing Games
    Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
    Lee, Chei Sian
    Low, Guanghao
    DIGITAL LIBRARIES: FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE, KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION, AND FUTURE CREATION: ICADL 2011, 2011, 7008 : 247 - 256
  • [26] Social media for pediatric research: what, who, why, and #?
    Bamat, Nicolas A.
    Manley, Brett J.
    Harer, Matthew W.
    Roland, Damian
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 84 (05) : 597 - 599
  • [27] Social media for pediatric research: what, who, why, and #?
    Nicolas A. Bamat
    Brett J. Manley
    Matthew W. Harer
    Damian Roland
    Pediatric Research, 2018, 84 : 597 - 599
  • [28] How to Impress Social Media Friends: The Social Motivations for Sharing Viral Content
    Botha, Elsamari
    Karam, Michael
    Ogbonna, Erinma
    Payne, Kelly
    Stiehler, Beate
    REDISCOVERING THE ESSENTIALITY OF MARKETING, 2016, : 243 - 257
  • [29] What Are Our Postoperative Hysterectomy Patients Sharing on Social Media?
    Onyechi, Elizabeth
    Sharma, Deepti
    Mirtsching, Drennen S.
    Hoffman, Mark
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 29S - 29S
  • [30] PRIVACY PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA BASED ON A HIERARCHICAL SECRET IMAGE SHARING SCHEME
    Beugnon, Sebastien
    Puteaux, Pauline
    Puech, William
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2019, : 679 - 683