What (or Who) Is Public? Privacy Settings and Social Media Content Sharing

被引:40
|
作者
Fiesler, Casey [1 ]
Dye, Michaelanne [2 ]
Feuston, Jessica L. [3 ]
Hiruncharoenvate, Chaya [2 ]
Hutto, C. J. [2 ]
Morrison, Shannon [4 ]
Roshan, Parisa Khanipour [2 ]
Pavalanathan, Umashanthi [2 ]
Bruckman, Amy S. [2 ]
De Choudhury, Munmun [2 ]
Gilbert, Eric [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Syracuse Univ, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
privacy; content analysis; Facebook; dataset; machine learning; Mechanical Turk; mixed methods; prediction; research methods; social media; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1145/2998181.2998223
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
When social networking sites give users granular control over their privacy settings, the result is that some content across the site is public and some is not. How might this content-or characteristics of users who post publicly versus to a limited audience-be different? If these differences exist, research studies of public content could potentially be introducing systematic bias. Via Mechanical Turk, we asked 1,815 Facebook users to share recent posts. Using qualitative coding and quantitative measures, we characterize and categorize the nature of the content. Using machine learning techniques, we analyze patterns of choices for privacy settings. Contrary to expectations, we find that content type is not a significant predictor of privacy setting; however, some demographics such as gender and age are predictive. Additionally, with consent of participants, we provide a dataset of nearly 9,000 public and non-public Facebook posts.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 580
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social media and students' privacy: What schools and districts should know
    Rosenberg, Joshua M.
    Burchfield, Macy
    Borchers, Conrad
    Gibbons, Benjamin
    Anderson, Daniel
    Fischer, Christian
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2021, 103 (02) : 49 - 53
  • [42] News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public
    Eady, Gregory
    Bonneau, Richard
    Tucker, Joshua A.
    Nagler, Jonathan
    POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2024,
  • [43] Network activated frames: content sharing and perceived polarization in social media
    Arugute, Natalia
    Calvo, Ernesto
    Ventura, Tiago
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 73 (01) : 14 - 24
  • [44] Teens' privacy management on video-sharing social media: the roles of perceived privacy risk and parental mediation
    Kang, Hyunjin
    Shin, Wonsun
    Huang, Junru
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (01) : 312 - 334
  • [45] Coordinate Live Streaming and Storage Sharing for Social Media Content Distribution
    Cheng, Xu
    Liu, Jiangchuan
    Wang, Haiyang
    Wang, Chonggang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2012, 14 (06) : 1558 - 1565
  • [46] Attitudes About 'Fair Use' and Content Sharing in Social Media Applications
    Faklaris, Cori
    Hook, Sara Anne
    CSCW'17: COMPANION OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, 2017, : 171 - 174
  • [47] Capitalizing on social media: An evaluation of the public's preferences for plastic surgery social media content
    Shiah, Eric
    Weidman, Allan A.
    Valentine, Lauren
    Alvarez, Angelica H.
    Foppiani, Jose A.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 83 : 308 - 317
  • [48] News Sharing in Social Media: A Review of Current Research on News Sharing Users, Content, and Networks
    Kuempel, Anna Sophie
    Karnowski, Veronika
    Keyling, Till
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2015, 1 (02):
  • [49] Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality
    Freberg, Karen
    Graham, Kristin
    McGaughey, Karen
    Freberg, Laura A.
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2011, 37 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [50] Public Information Sharing Behaviors Analysis over Different Social Media
    Hu, Qingbo
    Wang, Guan
    Yu, Philip S.
    2015 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATION AND INTERNET COMPUTING (CIC), 2015, : 62 - 69