Normative Database for Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

被引:48
|
作者
Hillenaar, Toine [1 ,2 ]
Cals, Roger H. H. [1 ]
Eilers, Paul H. C. [3 ]
Wubbels, Rene J. [2 ]
van Cleynenbreugel, Hugo [1 ]
Remeijer, Lies [1 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Cornea & External Dis Serv, NL-3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] ROI, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LIGHT-SCATTERING; RABBIT CORNEAS; THICKNESS; KERATOCYTE; POPULATION; DEPENDENCE; DENSITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.11-7747
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To ascertain the sex and age relatedness, diurnal variation, and repeatability of backscatter measurement in the normal human cornea. METHODS. Seven corneal backscatter variants were measured by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in both normal eyes (n = 314) of 157 healthy subjects. These subjects were assigned to one or more of three groups. The sex and age relatedness of corneal backscatter were assessed in group 1 (n = 300), which comprised 75 men and 75 women evenly distributed over five age categories. To assess diurnal variation, eyes in group 2 (n = 40) were measured four times a day, at 3-hour intervals. The eyes in group 3 (n = 50) were examined four times a year to determine intersession repeatability. Intrasession repeatability was determined by performing all IVCM examinations in duplicate. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of sex, age, and time of measurement on corneal backscatter. RESULTS. Mean corneal backscatter was 3.5% higher in men (P = 0.003). From the age of 50 years, backscatter increased significantly in the anterior stroma (P = 0.0003). A small but statistically significant diurnal variation was found in all seven backscatter variants (P < 0.01). The test-retest coefficient of variation of mean corneal backscatter was 5.3%, comprising intra- and intersession repeatability. CONCLUSIONS. Sex and time of measurement significantly affect corneal backscatter measured by IVCM, whereas age affects only backscatter in the anterior stroma. All three factors should be taken into account when conducting scientific research. For ophthalmic practice, the authors suggest ignoring these factors and propose a generalized normal range and minimum detectable change for each backscatter variant. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7274-7281) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7747
引用
收藏
页码:7274 / 7281
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluorescein enhanced confocal microscopy in vivo for the evaluation of corneal epithelium
    Mocan, Mehmet C.
    Irkec, Murat
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [42] Imaging posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy by in vivo confocal microscopy
    Grupcheva, CN
    Chew, GSM
    Edwards, M
    Craig, JP
    McGhee, CNJ
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 29 (04): : 256 - 259
  • [43] Diabetes and corneal cell densities in humans by in vivo confocal microscopy
    Quadrado, Maria Joao
    Popper, Monika
    Morgado, Antonio Miguel
    Murta, Joaquim Neto
    Van Best, Jaap A.
    CORNEA, 2006, 25 (07) : 761 - 768
  • [44] In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal endothelium in patients with retinitis pigmentosa
    Gedik, Sansal
    Gonul, Saban
    Koktekir, Bengu E.
    Bakbak, Berker
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (12) : 1330 - 1333
  • [46] In vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy Study in Climatic Droplet Keratopathy
    Serra, H. M.
    Croxatto, J.
    Cafaro, T. A.
    Esposito, F.
    Holopainen, J.
    Neira-Zalentein, W.
    Fornies, M.
    Urrets-Zavalia, J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [47] Analysis of corneal nerve plexus in corneal confocal microscopy images
    Yu-Chi Liu
    Molly Tzu-Yu Lin
    Jodhbir S.Mehta
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2021, 16 (04) : 690 - 691
  • [48] Rapid Image Evaluation System for Corneal In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
    Sindt, Christine W.
    Lay, Bruno
    Bouchard, Helene
    Kern, Jami R.
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (04) : 460 - 465
  • [49] Differential diagnosis of corneal oedema assisted by in vivo confocal microscopy
    Grupcheva, CN
    Craig, JP
    Sherwin, T
    McGhee, CN
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 29 (03): : 133 - 137
  • [50] In-vivo corneal confocal microscopy: Imaging analysis, biological insights and future directions
    Chiang, Jeremy Chung Bo
    Roy, Maitreyee
    Kim, Juno
    Markoulli, Maria
    Krishnan, Arun V.
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2023, 6 (01)