Normative Database for Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

被引:48
|
作者
Hillenaar, Toine [1 ,2 ]
Cals, Roger H. H. [1 ]
Eilers, Paul H. C. [3 ]
Wubbels, Rene J. [2 ]
van Cleynenbreugel, Hugo [1 ]
Remeijer, Lies [1 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Cornea & External Dis Serv, NL-3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] ROI, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LIGHT-SCATTERING; RABBIT CORNEAS; THICKNESS; KERATOCYTE; POPULATION; DEPENDENCE; DENSITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.11-7747
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To ascertain the sex and age relatedness, diurnal variation, and repeatability of backscatter measurement in the normal human cornea. METHODS. Seven corneal backscatter variants were measured by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in both normal eyes (n = 314) of 157 healthy subjects. These subjects were assigned to one or more of three groups. The sex and age relatedness of corneal backscatter were assessed in group 1 (n = 300), which comprised 75 men and 75 women evenly distributed over five age categories. To assess diurnal variation, eyes in group 2 (n = 40) were measured four times a day, at 3-hour intervals. The eyes in group 3 (n = 50) were examined four times a year to determine intersession repeatability. Intrasession repeatability was determined by performing all IVCM examinations in duplicate. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of sex, age, and time of measurement on corneal backscatter. RESULTS. Mean corneal backscatter was 3.5% higher in men (P = 0.003). From the age of 50 years, backscatter increased significantly in the anterior stroma (P = 0.0003). A small but statistically significant diurnal variation was found in all seven backscatter variants (P < 0.01). The test-retest coefficient of variation of mean corneal backscatter was 5.3%, comprising intra- and intersession repeatability. CONCLUSIONS. Sex and time of measurement significantly affect corneal backscatter measured by IVCM, whereas age affects only backscatter in the anterior stroma. All three factors should be taken into account when conducting scientific research. For ophthalmic practice, the authors suggest ignoring these factors and propose a generalized normal range and minimum detectable change for each backscatter variant. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7274-7281) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7747
引用
收藏
页码:7274 / 7281
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vivo confocal microscopy of cystic lesions in corneal disorders
    Orski, M.
    Wylegala, E.
    Tarnawska, D.
    Smedowski, A.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91
  • [32] Imaging of corneal nerves with in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)
    Messmer, Elisabeth M.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2022, 100
  • [33] In vivo confocal microscopy in the acute phase of corneal inflammation
    Kobayashi, A
    Maeda, A
    Sugiyama, K
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2003, 34 (05) : 433 - 436
  • [34] In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy in Mucolipidosis Type IV
    Martin, Gilles C.
    Bernabe-Gelot, Antoinette
    Gabison, Eric
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (04) : 521 - 521
  • [35] Ex vivo confocal microscopy of human corneal nerves
    Al-Aqaba, Mouhamed A.
    Alomar, Thaer
    Miri, Ammar
    Fares, Usama
    Otri, Ahmad Muneer
    Dua, Harmnider S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 94 (09) : 1251 - 1257
  • [36] Corneal Microstructural Analysis in Weill-Marchesani Syndrome by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
    Roszkowska, Anna M.
    Aragona, Pasquale
    OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 5 : 48 - 50
  • [37] Automated Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Corneal Images Using Deep Learning
    Oakley, Jonathan D.
    Russakoff, Daniel B.
    Weinberg, Rachel
    McCarron, Megan
    Brill, Samuel
    Misra, Stuti
    McGhee, Charles N.
    Mankowski, Joseph
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [38] Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy: Fellow Eye Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK
    Agca, Alper
    Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Cankaya, Kadir Ilker
    Guleryuz, Nimet Burcu
    Alkin, Zeynep
    Ozkaya, Abdullah
    Demirok, Ahmet
    Yilmaz, Omer Faruk
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 2014
  • [39] An in vivo confocal microscopy study of corneal changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome
    Terracciano, Luca
    Cennamo, Michela
    Favuzza, Eleonora
    Julia, Litasova
    Caporossi, Orsola
    Mencucci, Rita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) : 555 - 560
  • [40] Analysis of corneal nerve plexus in corneal confocal microscopy images
    Liu, Yu-Chi
    Lin, Molly
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (04) : 690 - 691