Normative Database for Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

被引:48
|
作者
Hillenaar, Toine [1 ,2 ]
Cals, Roger H. H. [1 ]
Eilers, Paul H. C. [3 ]
Wubbels, Rene J. [2 ]
van Cleynenbreugel, Hugo [1 ]
Remeijer, Lies [1 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Cornea & External Dis Serv, NL-3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] ROI, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LIGHT-SCATTERING; RABBIT CORNEAS; THICKNESS; KERATOCYTE; POPULATION; DEPENDENCE; DENSITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.11-7747
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To ascertain the sex and age relatedness, diurnal variation, and repeatability of backscatter measurement in the normal human cornea. METHODS. Seven corneal backscatter variants were measured by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in both normal eyes (n = 314) of 157 healthy subjects. These subjects were assigned to one or more of three groups. The sex and age relatedness of corneal backscatter were assessed in group 1 (n = 300), which comprised 75 men and 75 women evenly distributed over five age categories. To assess diurnal variation, eyes in group 2 (n = 40) were measured four times a day, at 3-hour intervals. The eyes in group 3 (n = 50) were examined four times a year to determine intersession repeatability. Intrasession repeatability was determined by performing all IVCM examinations in duplicate. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of sex, age, and time of measurement on corneal backscatter. RESULTS. Mean corneal backscatter was 3.5% higher in men (P = 0.003). From the age of 50 years, backscatter increased significantly in the anterior stroma (P = 0.0003). A small but statistically significant diurnal variation was found in all seven backscatter variants (P < 0.01). The test-retest coefficient of variation of mean corneal backscatter was 5.3%, comprising intra- and intersession repeatability. CONCLUSIONS. Sex and time of measurement significantly affect corneal backscatter measured by IVCM, whereas age affects only backscatter in the anterior stroma. All three factors should be taken into account when conducting scientific research. For ophthalmic practice, the authors suggest ignoring these factors and propose a generalized normal range and minimum detectable change for each backscatter variant. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7274-7281) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7747
引用
收藏
页码:7274 / 7281
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of conventional and accelerated corneal crosslinking: corneal epithelial remodeling and in vivo confocal microscopy analysis
    Haciagaoglu, Sezer
    Turhan, Semra Akkaya
    Toker, Ebru
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [22] Corneal immune cells: Linking in vivo corneal confocal microscopy and immunohistochemistry
    Colorado, Luisa H.
    Nasrin, Fatema
    Murray, Rachael
    Chinnery, Holly Rose
    Dando, Samantha
    Edwards, Katie
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [23] Repeatability of In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy to Quantify Corneal Nerve Morphology
    Petropoulos, Ioannis N.
    Manzoor, Tauseef
    Morgan, Philip
    Fadavi, Hassan
    Asghar, Omar
    Alam, Uazman
    Ponirakis, Georgios
    Dabbah, Mohammad A.
    Chen, Xin
    Graham, James
    Tavakoli, Mitra
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (05) : E83 - E89
  • [24] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease
    Cruzat, Andrea
    Qazi, Yureeda
    Hamrah, Pedram
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2017, 15 (01): : 15 - 47
  • [25] In vivo Confocal Microscopy for the Evaluation of Corneal Microstructure in Keratoconus
    Mocan, Mehmet C.
    Yilmaz, Pinar Topcu
    Irkec, Murat
    Orhan, Mehmet
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2008, 33 (11-12) : 933 - 939
  • [26] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy after Corneal Collagen Crosslinking
    Mazzotta, Cosimo
    Hafezi, Farhad
    Kymionis, George
    Caragiuli, Stefano
    Jacob, Soosan
    Traversi, Claudio
    Barabino, Stefano
    Randleman, J. Bradley
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2015, 13 (04): : 298 - 314
  • [27] Corneal Manifestations and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Gaucher Disease
    Geens, Sofie
    Kestelyn, Philippe
    Claerhout, Ilse
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (07) : E169 - E172
  • [28] In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal insect foreign body
    Wong, BWC
    Lai, JSM
    Law, RWK
    Lam, DSC
    CORNEA, 2003, 22 (01) : 56 - 58
  • [29] In vivo confocal microscopy in a patient with keratopigmentation (corneal tattooing)
    Kobayashi, A
    Sugiyama, K
    CORNEA, 2005, 24 (02) : 238 - 240
  • [30] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Findings in Corneal Stromal Dystrophies
    Okudan, Suleyman
    Kayitmazbatir, Emine Tinkir
    Oflaz, Ayse Bozkurt
    Bozkurt, Banu
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2025, 15 (02)