Normative Database for Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

被引:48
|
作者
Hillenaar, Toine [1 ,2 ]
Cals, Roger H. H. [1 ]
Eilers, Paul H. C. [3 ]
Wubbels, Rene J. [2 ]
van Cleynenbreugel, Hugo [1 ]
Remeijer, Lies [1 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Cornea & External Dis Serv, NL-3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] ROI, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LIGHT-SCATTERING; RABBIT CORNEAS; THICKNESS; KERATOCYTE; POPULATION; DEPENDENCE; DENSITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.11-7747
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To ascertain the sex and age relatedness, diurnal variation, and repeatability of backscatter measurement in the normal human cornea. METHODS. Seven corneal backscatter variants were measured by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in both normal eyes (n = 314) of 157 healthy subjects. These subjects were assigned to one or more of three groups. The sex and age relatedness of corneal backscatter were assessed in group 1 (n = 300), which comprised 75 men and 75 women evenly distributed over five age categories. To assess diurnal variation, eyes in group 2 (n = 40) were measured four times a day, at 3-hour intervals. The eyes in group 3 (n = 50) were examined four times a year to determine intersession repeatability. Intrasession repeatability was determined by performing all IVCM examinations in duplicate. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of sex, age, and time of measurement on corneal backscatter. RESULTS. Mean corneal backscatter was 3.5% higher in men (P = 0.003). From the age of 50 years, backscatter increased significantly in the anterior stroma (P = 0.0003). A small but statistically significant diurnal variation was found in all seven backscatter variants (P < 0.01). The test-retest coefficient of variation of mean corneal backscatter was 5.3%, comprising intra- and intersession repeatability. CONCLUSIONS. Sex and time of measurement significantly affect corneal backscatter measured by IVCM, whereas age affects only backscatter in the anterior stroma. All three factors should be taken into account when conducting scientific research. For ophthalmic practice, the authors suggest ignoring these factors and propose a generalized normal range and minimum detectable change for each backscatter variant. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7274-7281) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7747
引用
收藏
页码:7274 / 7281
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wide-Range Calibration of Corneal Backscatter Analysis by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
    Hillenaar, Toine
    Sicam, Victor Arni D. P.
    Vermeer, Koenraad A.
    Braaf, Boy
    Remeijer, Lies
    Cals, Roger H. H.
    de Boer, Johannes F.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (05) : 2136 - 2146
  • [2] Corneal chrysiasis: in vivo confocal microscopy analysis
    Paladin, Iacopo
    Menchini, Ugo
    Mencucci, Rita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 776 - 779
  • [3] Measurement of Corneal Backscatter by Scheimpflug and Confocal Microscopy.
    McLaren, Jay W.
    Kane, Katrina M.
    Wacker, Katrin
    Patel, Sanjay V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [4] In vivo corneal confocal microscopy in keratoconus
    Hollingsworth, JG
    Efron, N
    Tullo, AB
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [5] Automated analysis of in vivo confocal microscopy images of corneal nerves
    Misra, Stuti L.
    Oakley, Jonathan D.
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    Wang, Ellen F.
    Patel, Dipika
    Tarwater, Patrick M.
    Mankowski, Joseph L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [6] Calibration of Corneal Light Scatter Analysis by in vivo Confocal Microscopy
    Hillenaar, T.
    Sicam, V. A. D. P.
    Braaf, B.
    Cals, R. H. H.
    Remeijer, L.
    De Boer, J. F.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [7] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves: Analysis and Clinical Correlation
    Cruzat, Andrea
    Pavan-Langston, Deborah
    Hamrah, Pedram
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 25 (5-6) : 171 - 177
  • [8] In vivo confocal corneal microscopy after keratoplasty
    Imre, L
    Resch, M
    Nagymihály, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2005, 102 (02): : 140 - 146
  • [9] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Avellino Corneal Dystrophy
    Ozturk, Ozge
    Hakami, Sina
    Dugauquier, Artemise
    Roux, Pauline Le
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [10] Normative Values for Corneal NerveMorphology Assessed Using Corneal Confocal Microscopy: A Multinational Normative Data Set
    Tavakoli, Mitra
    Ferdousi, Maryam
    Petropoulos, Ioannis N.
    Morris, Julie
    Pritchard, Nicola
    Zhivov, Andrey
    Ziegler, Dan
    Pacaud, Daniele
    Romanchuk, Kenneth
    Perkins, Bruce A.
    Lovblom, Leif E.
    Bril, Vera
    Singleton, J. Robinson
    Smith, Gordon
    Boulton, Andrew J. M.
    Efron, Nathan
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (05) : 838 - 843