A Framework for Human-Robot Interaction User Studies

被引:5
|
作者
Rajendran, Vidyasagar [1 ]
Carreno-Medrano, Pamela [2 ]
Fisher, Wesley [1 ]
Werner, Alexander [1 ]
Kulic, Dana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341286
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) user studies are challenging to evaluate and compare due to a lack of standardization and the infrastructure required to implement each study. The lack of experimental infrastructure also makes it difficult to systematically evaluate the impact of individual components (e.g., the quality of perception software) on overall system performance. This work proposes a framework to ease the implementation and reproducibility of human-robot interaction user studies. The framework utilizes ROS middleware and is implemented with four modules: perception, decision, action, and metrics. The perception module aggregates sensor data to be used by the decision and action modules. The decision module is the task-level executive and can be designed by the HRI researcher for their specific task. The action module takes subtask requests from the decision module and breaks them down into motion primitives for execution on the robot. The metrics module tracks and generates quantitative metrics for the study. The framework is implemented with modular interfaces to allow for alternate implementations within each module and can be generalized for a variety of tasks and human/robot roles. The framework is illustrated through an example scenario involving a human and a Franka Emika Panda arm collaboratively assembling a toolbox together.
引用
收藏
页码:6215 / 6222
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] User feedback in human-robot interaction: Prosody, gaze and timing
    Skantze, Gabriel
    Oertel, Catharine
    Hjalmarsson, Anna
    [J]. 14TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2013), VOLS 1-5, 2013, : 1900 - 1904
  • [32] Exploring User's Trust Dynamics in Human-Robot Interaction
    Hulcelle, Marc
    Varni, Giovanna
    Rollet, Nicolas
    Clavel, Chloe
    [J]. AFFECTIVE SCIENCE, 2022, 3 (01)
  • [33] Hot or not? Exploring User Perceptions of thermal Human-Robot Interaction
    Borgstedt, J.
    Pollick, F. E.
    Brewster, S.
    [J]. 2022 31ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN 2022), 2022, : 1334 - 1340
  • [34] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [35] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    [J]. IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11
  • [36] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    [J]. ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [37] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    [J]. ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [38] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy, Robin R.
    Nomura, Tatsuya
    Billard, Aude
    Burke, Jennifer L.
    [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [39] Human-Robot Interaction
    Ivaldi, Serena
    Pateraki, Maria
    [J]. ERCIM NEWS, 2018, (114): : 6 - 7
  • [40] Low-Effort, Unqualified, and Malicious User Behaviors in Online Human-Robot Interaction Studies
    Li, Tony W.
    Jo, Yelin
    Brumbaugh, Zander
    Lee, Hanna
    Murray, Michael
    Bjorling, Elin A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION, SIGDOC 2023, 2023, : 63 - 69