Investigation of Artifacts and Optimization in Proton Resonance Frequency Thermometry Towards Heating Risk Monitoring of Implantable Medical Devices in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Feng [1 ]
Jiang, Changqing [1 ]
Li, Yichao [2 ]
Niu, Xiaoyue [3 ,4 ]
Long, Tiangang [1 ]
He, Changgeng [1 ]
Ding, Jianqi [1 ]
Li, Linze [1 ]
Li, Luming [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, Natl Engn Lab Neuromodulat, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Stat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electrodes; Heating systems; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phantoms; Radio frequency; Lead; Temperature measurement; Artifact; deep brain stimulation; magnetic resonance thermometry; proton resonance frequency; radio frequency heating; DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION; MRI; MODEL; FIELD; CHALLENGES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2021.3081599
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: Artifacts limit the application of proton resonance frequency (PRF) thermometry for on-site, individualized heating evaluations of implantable medical devices such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) for use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its properties are unclear and the research on how to choose an unaffected measurement region is insufficient. Methods: The properties of PRF signals around the metallic DBS electrode were investigated through simulations and phantom experiments considering electromagnetic interferences from material susceptibility and the radio frequency (RF) interactions. A threshold method on phase difference Delta phi was used to define a measurement area to estimate heating at the electrode surface. Its performance was compared to that of the Bayesian magnitude method and probe measurements. Results: The B-0 magnetic field inhomogeneity due to the electrode susceptibility was the main influencing factor on PRF compared to the RF artifact. Delta phi around the electrode followed normal distribution but was distorted. Underestimation occurred at places with high temperature rises. The noise was increased and could be well estimated from magnitude images using a modified NEMA method. The Delta phi-threshold method based on this knowledge outperformed the Bayesian magnitude method by more than 42% in estimation error of the electrode heating. Conclusion: The findings favor the use of PRF with the proposed approach as a reliable method for electrode heating estimation. Significance: This study clarified the influence of device artifacts and could improve the performance of PRF thermometry for individualized heating assessments of patients with implants under MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:3638 / 3646
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heat-source orientation and geometry dependence in proton-resonance frequency shift magnetic resonance thermometry
    Peters, RD
    Hinks, RS
    Henkelman, RM
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1999, 41 (05) : 909 - 918
  • [22] Quantitative Assessment of Artifacts on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Pacemakers and Implantable Defibrillators
    Sasaki, Takeshi
    Hansford, Rozann
    Zviman, Menekhem M.
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Calkins, Hugh
    Bluemke, David A.
    Halperin, Henry R.
    Nazarian, Saman
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [23] Implantable, Bioresorbable Radio Frequency Resonant Circuits for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lee, Geumbee
    Does, Mark D. D.
    Avila, Raudel
    Kang, Juyeon
    Harkins, Kevin D. D.
    Wu, Yunyun
    Banks, William E. E.
    Park, Minsu
    Lu, Di
    Yan, Xinqiang
    Kim, Jong Uk
    Won, Sang Min
    Evans, Adam G. G.
    Joseph, Jeremy T. T.
    Kalmar, Christopher L. L.
    Pollins, Alonda C. C.
    Karagoz, Huseyin
    Thayer, Wesley P. P.
    Huang, Yonggang
    Rogers, John A. A.
    ADVANCED SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (27)
  • [24] In vitro study of the magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of six supraglottic airway devices
    Zaballos, M.
    Bastida, E.
    Del Castillo, T.
    Guzman de Villoria, J.
    Jimenez de la Fuente, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 244 - 245
  • [25] Intracranial pressure monitoring devices compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging
    Russell Chabanne
    Laurent Gergele
    Yoann Launey
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2023, 49 : 472 - 474
  • [26] Intracranial pressure monitoring devices compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging
    Chabanne, Russell
    Gergele, Laurent
    Launey, Yoann
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (04) : 472 - 474
  • [27] Mortality After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Devices
    Padmanabhan, Deepak
    Jondal, Mary L.
    Hodge, David O.
    Mehta, Ramila A.
    Acker, Nancy G.
    Dalzell, Connie M.
    Kapa, Suraj
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 11 (01):
  • [28] Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Strom, Jordan B.
    Whelan, Jill B.
    Shen, Changyu
    Zheng, Shuang Qi
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (08) : 1138 - 1144
  • [29] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study
    Navarro-Valverde, Cristina
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    Jose Romero-Reyes, M.
    Esteve-Ruiz, Irene
    Garcia-Medina, Dolores
    Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo
    Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal
    Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan
    Cayuela, Aurelio
    Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 91 : 9 - 15
  • [30] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads
    Schaller, Robert D.
    Brunker, Tamara
    Riley, Michael P.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Litt, Harold
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05) : 549 - 556