Blood pressure response to close or loose contact between physician and patient during attended office blood pressure measurement

被引:0
|
作者
Seidlerova, Jitka [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Filipovsky, Jan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kordikova, Veronika [1 ,2 ]
Gelzinsky, Julius [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mares, Stepan [1 ,2 ]
Mayer, Otto, Jr. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Univ Hosp, Internal Dept 2, Plzen, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Pilsen, Plzen, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Pilsen, Biomed Ctr, Plzen, Czech Republic
关键词
Blood pressure measurement; attended office blood pressure; unattended office blood pressure; beat-to-beat BP measurement;
D O I
10.1080/08037051.2022.2104694
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Purpose Compared to unattended office blood pressure (uOBP), attended office blood pressure (aOBP) is higher. It is not known, however, to what extent distance between physician and patient influences blood pressure (BP) values. Materials and methods Participants were stable hypertensive patients, followed in the university hospital-based out-patient center. During a session, automated office BP was measured three times after a pre-set five-minute pause, using the Omron 907 device; both aOBP and uOBP were done, in a random order. Simultaneously, beat-to-beat BP measurement was performed using the Finapress device. During aOBP, some participants were in close contact with the physician while others were in loose contact where the doctor was sitting in the room about 2.5 m apart. One year later, the second session with the same protocol was organized, but the close and loose contact were interchanged. The data were analyzed using a paired t-test. Results Complete data were collected in 32 patients, baseline uOBP was 122.8 +/- 14.8/69.5 +/- 11.7 mmHg. Systolic and diastolic aOBP with close contact was higher by 4.6 +/- 6.9 and 1.9 +/- 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.0007 and 0.0039, respectively), while aOBP with loose contact was not different from uOBP. Beat-to-beat BP increased during aOBP by 6.5 +/- 8.5/3.3 +/- 4.8 mmHg. The increase persisted during all the three aOBP measurements (p < 0.0001 for all systolic and diastolic BP values); the results were similar for close and loose contact. The peak increase during uOBP was of similar magnitude as during aOBP but it lasted shorter: it reached the significance level of p < 0.0001 only during the first uOBP measurement. Conclusions Compared to uOBP, aOBP values were higher with close, but not with loose contact between physician and patient. These differences were, however, not detected by beat-to-beat BP measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The great myth of office blood pressure measurement
    Myers, Martin G.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (10) : 1894 - 1898
  • [42] Comparison of automated office blood pressure measurement with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement
    Peeters, Laura E. J.
    van Oortmerssen, Julie A. E.
    Derks, Lieke H.
    den Hertog, Heleen
    Fonville, Susanne
    Verboon, Christine
    Rietdijk, Wim J. R.
    Boersma, Eric
    Koudstaal, Peter J.
    van den Meiracker, Anton H.
    Versmissen, Jorie
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2022, 31 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [43] Principles of Blood Pressure Measurement - Current Techniques, Office vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.
    Vischer, Annina S.
    Burkard, Thilo
    HYPERTENSION: FROM BASIC RESEARCH TO CLINICAL PRACTICE, VOL 2, 2017, 956 : 85 - 96
  • [44] UNATTENDED AUTOMATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT VERSUS CLASSIC OFFICE AUTOMATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN A HYPERTENSION OUTPATIENT CLINIC
    Legrady, Peter
    Fejes, Imola
    Czombos, Andras
    Abraham, Gyorgy
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (SUPPL) : E99 - E99
  • [45] Comparison of nurse attended and unattended automated office blood pressure with conventional measurement techniques in clinical practice
    Elvira Fanelli
    Silvia Di Monaco
    Marco Pappaccogli
    Elisabetta Eula
    Chiara Fasano
    Chiara Bertello
    Franco Veglio
    Franco Rabbia
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2022, 36 : 833 - 838
  • [46] Agreement Between Community Pharmacy, Physician's Office, and Home Blood Pressure Measurement Methods: The Palmera Study
    Sendra-Lillo, Jose
    Sabater-Hernandez, Daniel
    Sendra-Ortola, Angel
    Martinez-Martinez, Fernando
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 25 (03) : 290 - 296
  • [47] Comparison of nurse attended and unattended automated office blood pressure with conventional measurement techniques in clinical practice
    Fanelli, Elvira
    Di Monaco, Silvia
    Pappaccogli, Marco
    Eula, Elisabetta
    Fasano, Chiara
    Bertello, Chiara
    Veglio, Franco
    Rabbia, Franco
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2022, 36 (09) : 833 - 838
  • [48] COMPARISON BETWEEN AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE AND REPEATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MASKED AND WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION
    Crippa, G.
    Cassi, A.
    Fares, M. L.
    Bravi, E.
    Cavallotti, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E80 - E80
  • [49] Differences between office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement during pregnancy
    Churchill, D
    Beevers, DG
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (03): : 455 - 461
  • [50] In-office and out-of-office blood pressure measurement
    Asayama, Kei
    Ohkubo, Takayoshi
    Imai, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2024, 38 (06) : 477 - 485