Blood pressure response to close or loose contact between physician and patient during attended office blood pressure measurement

被引:0
|
作者
Seidlerova, Jitka [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Filipovsky, Jan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kordikova, Veronika [1 ,2 ]
Gelzinsky, Julius [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mares, Stepan [1 ,2 ]
Mayer, Otto, Jr. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Univ Hosp, Internal Dept 2, Plzen, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Pilsen, Plzen, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Pilsen, Biomed Ctr, Plzen, Czech Republic
关键词
Blood pressure measurement; attended office blood pressure; unattended office blood pressure; beat-to-beat BP measurement;
D O I
10.1080/08037051.2022.2104694
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Purpose Compared to unattended office blood pressure (uOBP), attended office blood pressure (aOBP) is higher. It is not known, however, to what extent distance between physician and patient influences blood pressure (BP) values. Materials and methods Participants were stable hypertensive patients, followed in the university hospital-based out-patient center. During a session, automated office BP was measured three times after a pre-set five-minute pause, using the Omron 907 device; both aOBP and uOBP were done, in a random order. Simultaneously, beat-to-beat BP measurement was performed using the Finapress device. During aOBP, some participants were in close contact with the physician while others were in loose contact where the doctor was sitting in the room about 2.5 m apart. One year later, the second session with the same protocol was organized, but the close and loose contact were interchanged. The data were analyzed using a paired t-test. Results Complete data were collected in 32 patients, baseline uOBP was 122.8 +/- 14.8/69.5 +/- 11.7 mmHg. Systolic and diastolic aOBP with close contact was higher by 4.6 +/- 6.9 and 1.9 +/- 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.0007 and 0.0039, respectively), while aOBP with loose contact was not different from uOBP. Beat-to-beat BP increased during aOBP by 6.5 +/- 8.5/3.3 +/- 4.8 mmHg. The increase persisted during all the three aOBP measurements (p < 0.0001 for all systolic and diastolic BP values); the results were similar for close and loose contact. The peak increase during uOBP was of similar magnitude as during aOBP but it lasted shorter: it reached the significance level of p < 0.0001 only during the first uOBP measurement. Conclusions Compared to uOBP, aOBP values were higher with close, but not with loose contact between physician and patient. These differences were, however, not detected by beat-to-beat BP measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship between body mass and ambulatory blood pressure: comparison with office blood pressure measurement and effect of treatment
    Baird, Stacy W.
    Jin, Zhezhen
    Okajima, Kazue
    Russo, Cesare
    Schwartz, Joseph E.
    Elkind, Mitchell S. V.
    Rundek, Tatjana
    Homma, Shunichi
    Sacco, Ralph L.
    Di Tullio, Marco R.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2018, 32 (02) : 122 - 128
  • [32] Patients may simultaneously have a hypertensive response to a physician in the office (PEF) and a higher home blood pressure than office blood pressure (masked effect)
    Adiyaman, A.
    Aksoy, I.
    Deinum, J.
    Lenders, J.
    Thien, T.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S35 - S35
  • [33] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus office blood pressure measurement: Are there sex differences?
    Miladinovic, Aleksandar
    Ajcevic, Milos
    Siveri, Giulia
    Liguori, Laura
    Pascazio, Lorenzo
    Accardo, Agostino
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 2912 - 2918
  • [34] Home blood pressure measurement in prehypertension and untreated hypertension: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure
    Zhuo, Shang
    Wen, Wang
    Li-Yuan, Ma
    Shu-Yu, Wang
    Yi-Xin, Wang
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2009, 14 (06) : 245 - 250
  • [35] Comparison of self blood pressure measurement and office blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients
    Chatellier, G
    Genès, N
    Vaur, L
    Bobrie, G
    Vaïsse, B
    Clerson, P
    Mallion, JM
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 : S40 - S41
  • [36] Repeated office blood pressure measurement by automated device to evaluate blood pressure control
    Crippa, G
    Sverzellati, E
    Venturi, C
    Antoniotti, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (05) : 46A - 46A
  • [37] Should the measurement of blood pressure in the office be redefined?
    Stergiou, George S.
    Parati, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (10) : 1906 - 1908
  • [38] When office blood pressure measurement is not enough
    Barrios, Vivencio
    Escobar, Carlos
    Echarri, Rocio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 145 (01) : 101 - 101
  • [39] Office blood pressure measurement: A comprehensive review
    Siddique, Saulat
    Hameed Khan, Aamir
    Shahab, Hunaina
    Zhang, Yu-Qing
    Chin Tay, Jam
    Buranakitjaroen, Peera
    Turana, Yuda
    Verma, Narsingh
    Chen, Chen-Huan
    Cheng, Hao-Min
    Wang, Tzung-Dau
    Van Minh, Huynh
    Chia, Yook-Chin
    Kario, Kazuomi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (03): : 440 - 449
  • [40] Sources of Error in Office Blood Pressure Measurement
    Morcos, Roy N.
    Carter, Kimbroe J.
    Castro, Frank
    Koirala, Sumira
    Sharma, Deepti
    Syed, Haroon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (05) : 732 - 738