共 50 条
Home blood pressure measurement in prehypertension and untreated hypertension: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure
被引:10
|作者:
Zhuo, Shang
[1
,2
]
Wen, Wang
[1
]
Li-Yuan, Ma
Shu-Yu, Wang
[3
]
Yi-Xin, Wang
[3
]
机构:
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Cardiovasc Inst, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Hypertens League Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词:
ambulatory;
blood pressure;
blood pressure monitoring;
home blood pressure;
masked hypertension;
white-coat hypertension;
SOCIETY-OF-HYPERTENSION;
MASKED HYPERTENSION;
VARIABILITY;
VALIDATION;
GUIDELINES;
DIAGNOSIS;
D O I:
10.1097/MBP.0b013e328332fd25
中图分类号:
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100210 ;
摘要:
Objectives (i) To explore blood pressure (BP) baseline characteristics in prehypertension (PH) and untreated essential hypertension (HT), and 00 to evaluate whether simple home blood pressure (HBP) measurement can provide more reliable BP information than office blood pressure (OBP) in PH and untreated essential HT, and (iii) to investigate whether HBP measurement can also satisfactorily screen out masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH) by comparing with ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. Methods We recruited 122 Beijing community volunteers. According to OBP measurement, they were divided into three groups, including PH group (n=51), stage 1 HT group (HT-1, n = 51) and stage 2 HT group (HT-2, n = 20). We calculated average OBP, HBP, and ABP, detection rate of MH, WCH, and nondipper status percentage in each group. Results Nondipper status percentage of PH, HT-1, and HT-2 was 54.9, 45.1, and 75%, respectively. Except for diastolic blood pressure difference between HBP and ABP, the others did not reach statistical significance. ABP correlated more strongly with HBP than OBP. Detection rate of MH in PH participants by HBP and ABP was 49.0 and 52.9% (P=0.56), respectively, and MH diagnostic agreement between ABP and HBP was moderate (kappa=0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.76). Detection rate of WCH in stage 1 HT participants by HBP and ABP was 9.8 and 11.8% (P=0.65), respectively, and WCH diagnostic agreement between ABP and H B P was moderate (kappa = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.87). Conclusion Nondipper status percentage was higher in PH and untreated HT, and detection rate of MH in PH participants was also higher. The simple HBP measurement can provide more reliable and actual BP information and may be a feasibility of screening out MH and WCH for the clinical practice. Blood Press Monit 14:245-250 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文