The great myth of office blood pressure measurement

被引:87
|
作者
Myers, Martin G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, Schulich Heart Program, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
automated sphygmomanometers; blood pressure measurement; EDUCATION-PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS; HYPERTENSION; ALGORITHM; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; SELF;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283577b05
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Clinical practice guidelines have traditionally recommended manual blood pressure (BP) measurement in the office setting as the standard method for diagnosing hypertension. In reality, manual BP in routine clinical practice is relatively inaccurate, over-diagnoses hypertension by provoking office-induced increases in BP and correlates poorly with both the awake ambulatory BP and target organ damage. The most recent guidelines recommend 24-h ambulatory BP and home BP for diagnosing hypertension. The advent of automated office BP (AOBP) represents a third alternative to conventional manual BP measurement, one that maintains the role of office BP readings in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. AOBP has three basic principles: multiple readings taken using a fully automated sphygmomanometer with the patient resting quietly alone. AOBP eliminates office-induced hypertension such that the cut-point for a normal AOBP is the same as for the awake ambulatory BP and home BP. As compared to routine manual office BP, AOBP provides more accurate BP readings, is more consistent during repeated office visits and in different settings and correlates better with both the awake ambulatory BP and target organ damage. The advantages of AOBP over manual BP measurement support its use in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1894 / 1898
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of Blood Pressure in the Office
    Martin, Catherine A.
    Cameron, James D.
    Chen, Suzi S.
    McGrath, Barry P.
    HYPERTENSION, 2010, 56 (01) : E11 - E11
  • [2] Myth making in the measurement of blood pressure
    Jolobe, Oscar M. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 25 (01) : E11 - E11
  • [3] Response to Measurement of Blood Pressure in the Office
    Myers, Martin G.
    HYPERTENSION, 2010, 56 (01) : E12 - E12
  • [4] Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement
    Myers, Martin G.
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 48 (04) : 241 - 250
  • [5] Out-of-Office Blood Pressure: A Complement to Office Blood Pressure, or Is it Just Another Measurement
    Adji, Audrey
    Tan, Isabella
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 36 (02) : 82 - 86
  • [6] In-office and out-of-office blood pressure measurement
    Asayama, Kei
    Ohkubo, Takayoshi
    Imai, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2024, 38 (06) : 477 - 485
  • [7] Should the measurement of blood pressure in the office be redefined?
    Stergiou, George S.
    Parati, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (10) : 1906 - 1908
  • [8] When office blood pressure measurement is not enough
    Barrios, Vivencio
    Escobar, Carlos
    Echarri, Rocio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 145 (01) : 101 - 101
  • [9] Office blood pressure measurement: A comprehensive review
    Siddique, Saulat
    Hameed Khan, Aamir
    Shahab, Hunaina
    Zhang, Yu-Qing
    Chin Tay, Jam
    Buranakitjaroen, Peera
    Turana, Yuda
    Verma, Narsingh
    Chen, Chen-Huan
    Cheng, Hao-Min
    Wang, Tzung-Dau
    Van Minh, Huynh
    Chia, Yook-Chin
    Kario, Kazuomi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (03): : 440 - 449
  • [10] Sources of Error in Office Blood Pressure Measurement
    Morcos, Roy N.
    Carter, Kimbroe J.
    Castro, Frank
    Koirala, Sumira
    Sharma, Deepti
    Syed, Haroon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (05) : 732 - 738