Performance of full-field digital mammography versus digital breast

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Mengru
Zhuang, Shan
Sheng, Liuli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yu Nian
Shen, Wenrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Radiol, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Canc Hosp, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
来源
PRECISION MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; sensitivity; specificity; CANCER INCIDENCE; TOMOSYNTHESIS; MORTALITY; BENEFITS; PATTERNS; HARMS;
D O I
10.1002/prm2.12068
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Studies have shown that the combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) can improve the display of malignant tumors, reduce false positive results, and make up for the major deficiencies of traditional DM. In addition, the recall rate of patients with combined DBT was significantly reduced, especially those under 50 years of age and those with dense breast glands. The objective of this study is to compare the difference of DM and DM+ DBT in the diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors in different subgroups. A retrospective analysis was performed on 578 pathologically confirmed breast diseases in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. All were female, aged 23-85, with an average age of 53. Their DM and DBT images will be reviewed in an independent blind manner by an experienced radiologist. The doctor was unable to obtain the results of previous tests. The sensitivity and specificity of population samples and different subgroups were calculated. Overall sensitivity was 65% for DM, 93% for DM+ DBT. The addition of DBT significantly increased the tumor detection rate (odds ratio, 7.05; 95% confidence interval: 4.78, 10.4; p = .00), the difference was statistically significant. For patients <50 years of age, the sensitivity of DM+ DBT (94%) was significantly higher than that of DM (54%), and for patients with breast density of 50% or more, the sensitivity of DM and DM+ DBT were 59% and 92% (p < .001). The sensitivity of DM+ DBT (92%) was significantly higher than that of DM alone (39%) in patients whose primary imaging feature was non-mass (p < 0.001). Specificity was 77% for DM and 87% for DM+ DBT. The addition of DBT improved the specificity of DM in patients with high-density breast and the sensitivity of DM to all subgroups. DBT has potential benefits for diagnosing of benign and malignant tumors, especially for young women with dense breasts.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Akhtar, Amana L.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (05) : 1143 - 1148
  • [2] Digital Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Hall, Ferris M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [3] Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: Preliminary results
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Baldan, Enrica
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    La Grassa, Manuela
    Pescarini, Luigi
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 477 - 482
  • [4] Invasive breast cancer: Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography
    Hwang, Esther
    Szabo, Janet
    Mehta, Anita
    Margolies, Laurie
    [J]. APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (12) : 32 - 34
  • [5] Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cochon, Laila R.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (08) : 999 - 1003
  • [6] Full-field digital mammography
    Bick, U
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 957 - 964
  • [7] Full-field digital mammography
    U Bick
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [8] Comparison of Radiologist Performance with Photon-Counting Full-Field Digital Mammography to Conventional Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cole, Elodia B.
    Toledano, Alicia Y.
    Lundqvist, Mats
    Pisano, Etta D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 916 - 922
  • [9] AN OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY COMPARING THE INTERPRETATION OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY WITH DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
    Wasan, Rema K.
    Iqbal, Asif
    Evans, David R.
    Peacock, Clare
    Morel, Juliet C.
    Douiri, Abdel
    Michell, Michael J.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (06): : 32 - 32
  • [10] Threshold in breast compression reduction for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Afandy, A. N.
    Tori, M. B.
    Bintalib, S. O.
    Soh, B. L. P.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 217 - 225