Performance of full-field digital mammography versus digital breast

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Mengru
Zhuang, Shan
Sheng, Liuli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yu Nian
Shen, Wenrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Radiol, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Canc Hosp, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, 42 Baiziting Rd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
来源
PRECISION MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; sensitivity; specificity; CANCER INCIDENCE; TOMOSYNTHESIS; MORTALITY; BENEFITS; PATTERNS; HARMS;
D O I
10.1002/prm2.12068
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Studies have shown that the combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) can improve the display of malignant tumors, reduce false positive results, and make up for the major deficiencies of traditional DM. In addition, the recall rate of patients with combined DBT was significantly reduced, especially those under 50 years of age and those with dense breast glands. The objective of this study is to compare the difference of DM and DM+ DBT in the diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors in different subgroups. A retrospective analysis was performed on 578 pathologically confirmed breast diseases in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. All were female, aged 23-85, with an average age of 53. Their DM and DBT images will be reviewed in an independent blind manner by an experienced radiologist. The doctor was unable to obtain the results of previous tests. The sensitivity and specificity of population samples and different subgroups were calculated. Overall sensitivity was 65% for DM, 93% for DM+ DBT. The addition of DBT significantly increased the tumor detection rate (odds ratio, 7.05; 95% confidence interval: 4.78, 10.4; p = .00), the difference was statistically significant. For patients <50 years of age, the sensitivity of DM+ DBT (94%) was significantly higher than that of DM (54%), and for patients with breast density of 50% or more, the sensitivity of DM and DM+ DBT were 59% and 92% (p < .001). The sensitivity of DM+ DBT (92%) was significantly higher than that of DM alone (39%) in patients whose primary imaging feature was non-mass (p < 0.001). Specificity was 77% for DM and 87% for DM+ DBT. The addition of DBT improved the specificity of DM in patients with high-density breast and the sensitivity of DM to all subgroups. DBT has potential benefits for diagnosing of benign and malignant tumors, especially for young women with dense breasts.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of screening full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis technical recalls
    Salkowski, Lonie R.
    Elezaby, Mai
    Fowler, Amy M.
    Burnside, Elizabeth
    Woods, Ryan W.
    Strigel, Roberta M.
    [J]. 14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718
  • [32] Comparison of screening full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis technical recalls
    Salkowski, Lonie R.
    Elezaby, Mai
    Fowler, Amy M.
    Burnside, Elizabeth
    Woods, Ryan W.
    Strigel, Roberta M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [33] Impact of insurance coverage and socioeconomic factors on screening mammography patients' selection of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography
    Falomo, Eniola
    Myers, Kelly
    Reichel, Kent F.
    Carson, Kathryn A.
    Mullen, Lisa
    Di Carlo, Philip
    Harvey, Susan
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06): : 1091 - 1093
  • [34] Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography
    Nykanen, KM
    Siltanen, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 120 - 121
  • [35] Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Byung Gil
    Song, ByungJoo
    Jung, Haijo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2014, 27 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [36] Current status of full-field digital mammography
    Pisano, ED
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) : 26 - 28
  • [37] Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Jae Jeong Choi
    Sung Hun Kim
    Bong Joo Kang
    Byung Gil Choi
    ByungJoo Song
    Haijo Jung
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2014, 27 : 231 - 236
  • [38] Current status of full-field digital mammography
    Pisano, ED
    Yaffe, MJ
    Hemminger, BM
    Hendrick, RE
    Niklason, LT
    Maidment, ADA
    Kimme-Smith, CM
    Feig, SA
    Sickles, EA
    Braeuning, MP
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (04) : 266 - 280
  • [39] Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography
    Nykänen, K
    Siltanen, S
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, 5030 : 137 - 146
  • [40] Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography:: Comparison in breast cancer screening
    Sigfússon, BF
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 663 - 663