Stimulating boundary crossing learning in a multi-stakeholder learning environment for sustainable development

被引:10
|
作者
Oonk, Carla [1 ]
Gulikers, Judith [1 ]
den Brok, Perry [1 ]
Mulder, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Educ & Learning Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Boundary crossing; Higher education; Transdisciplinary learning; Interdisciplinary; Multi-stakeholder learning environment; Sustainability; SERVICE; COMPETENCES; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0156
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Sustainable development requires multiple stakeholders to work and learn across practices, in other words, it requires boundary crossing competence. To prepare students for their future sustainability professions, higher education should facilitate the development of boundary crossing competence in its curricula. This study aims to confirm whether boundary crossing learning can be stimulated by workshop-based support in multi-stakeholder projects. Design/methodology/approach This quasi-experimental intervention study (N = 122) investigates the effect of a series of supporting workshops on students' boundary crossing learning in multi-stakeholder projects. The workshops allowed students to adopt four learning mechanisms (identification, coordination, reflection and transformation) theorised to stimulate learning across boundaries between practices. Students followed zero, one, or two workshops. By analysing the student learning reports, the study examines the effect of the workshop intervention on students' self-efficacy for stakeholder collaboration, the number of reported student-stakeholder collaborative activities and the reported boundary crossing learning mechanisms. Findings The results show that a series of two workshops increase the number of reported collaborative activities and activates the students' boundary crossing learning in terms of reflection and transformation. Research limitations/implications These findings support the evidence-based design of multi-stakeholder learning environments for sustainable development and contribute to the body of knowledge regarding learning across practices. Originality/value Boundary crossing competence receives increasing attention as an asset for sustainable development. The added value of this study lies in its confirmation that the boundary crossing theory can be translated into directed educational support that can stimulate students' boundary crossing learning.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 40
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework
    Waligo, Victoria M.
    Clarke, Jackie
    Hawkins, Rebecca
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 36 : 342 - 353
  • [42] An Integrated and Multi-Stakeholder Approach for Sustainable Phosphorus Management in Agriculture
    Colombo, Federico
    Pesenti, Michele
    Araniti, Fabrizio
    Pilu, Salvatore Roberto
    Nocito, Fabio Francesco
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [43] Educating Boundary Crossing Planners: Evidence for Student Learning in the Multistakeholder Regional Learning Environment
    Oonk, Carla
    Gulikers, Judith
    Mulder, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (03) : 360 - 373
  • [44] A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards
    Pereno, Amina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    [J]. FUTURES, 2020, 122
  • [45] Strengthening decision-making on sustainable agricultural intensification through multi-stakeholder social learning in sub-Saharan Africa
    Lamboll, Richard
    Nelson, Valerie
    Gebreyes, Million
    Kambewa, Daimon
    Chinsinga, Blessings
    Karbo, Naaminong
    Rukonge, Audax
    Sekeleti, Martin
    Litaba Wakun'uma, Wesley
    Gutema, Tamene H.
    Henjewele, Magreth
    Kampanje-Phiri, Jessica
    Masikati-Hlanguyo, Patricia
    Quaye, Wilhelmina
    Duah, Solomon
    Kivuyo, Mbarwa
    Nyanga, Progress
    Akuffobea Essilfie, Mavis
    Nana Yamoah, Asafu-Adjaye
    Clottey, Victor
    Martin, Adrienne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 19 (5-6) : 609 - 635
  • [46] Multi-stakeholder initiatives, policy learning and institutionalization: the surprising failure of open government in Norway
    Wilson, Christopher
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 42 (02) : 173 - 192
  • [47] Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
    Sartas, Murat
    Schut, Marc
    Hermans, Frans
    van Asten, Piet
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [48] The war on drugs: how multi-stakeholder partnerships contribute to sustainable development in the Golden Triangle region
    Song, Hee-Chan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2024, 55 (05) : 593 - 615
  • [49] Accelerating the realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals through metrological multi-stakeholder interoperability
    da Cruz, A. Lips
    Fisher, W. P., Jr.
    Pendrill, L.
    Felin, A.
    [J]. JOINT IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13-TC18 SYMPOSIUM, 2019, 1379
  • [50] Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
    Anica Zeyen
    Markus Beckmann
    Stella Wolters
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 135 : 341 - 360