Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale

被引:23
|
作者
Sartas, Murat [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schut, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Hermans, Frans
van Asten, Piet [4 ,5 ]
Leeuwis, Cees [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] IITA, Kigali, Rwanda
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Rural Dev & Nat Resource Management, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Leibniz Inst Agr Dev Transit Econ IAMO, Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[5] IITA, Kampala, Uganda
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; DIFFUSION; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT; LENS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0197993
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have been playing an increasing role in interventions aiming to generate and scale innovations in agricultural systems. However, the contribution of MSPs in achieving innovations and scaling has been varied, and many factors have been reported to be important for their performance. This paper aims to provide evidence on the contribution of MSPs to innovation and scaling by focusing on three developing country cases in Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Rwanda. Through social network analysis and logistic models, the paper studies the changes in the characteristics of multi-stakeholder innovation networks targeted by MSPs and identifies factors that play significant roles in triggering these changes. The results demonstrate that MSPs do not necessarily expand and decentralize innovation networks but can lead to contraction and centralization in the initial years of implementation. They show that some of the intended next users of interventions with MSPs-local-level actors-left the innovation networks, whereas the lead organization controlling resource allocation in the MSPs substantially increased its centrality. They also indicate that not all the factors of change in innovation networks are country specific. Initial conditions of innovation networks and funding provided by the MSPs are common factors explaining changes in innovation networks across countries and across different network functions. The study argues that investigating multi-stakeholder innovation network characteristics targeted by the MSP using a network approach in early implementation can contribute to better performance in generating and scaling innovations, and that funding can be an effective implementation tool in developing country contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing participation dynamics in research for development interventions with multi-stakeholder platforms: A metric approach to studying stakeholder participation
    Sartas, Murat
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    McCampbell, Mariette
    Awori, Moureen
    Muchunguzi, Perez
    Tenywa, Moses
    Namazzi, Sylvia
    Amat, Ana Sole
    Thiele, Graham
    Proietti, Claudio
    Devaux, Andre
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [2] Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management
    Lankford, Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (02) : 321 - 322
  • [3] Elements of success in multi-stakeholder deliberation platforms
    Garard J.
    Koch L.
    Kowarsch M.
    [J]. Palgrave Communications, 4 (1)
  • [4] Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management
    Rennie, Hamish
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2010, 47 (03) : 221 - 223
  • [5] Multi-stakeholder engagement
    Blenkus, M. Gabrijelcic
    Kronegger, L.
    Pushkarev, N.
    Robnik, M.
    Sotlar, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [6] Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling
    Hermans, Frans
    Sartas, Murat
    Van Schagen, Boudy
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [7] Environmental capability development in a multi-stakeholder network setting: Dynamic learning through multi-stakeholder interactions
    Baranova, Polina
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (07) : 3406 - 3420
  • [8] Multi-Stakeholder Privacy and Safety on Content Creation Platforms
    Li, Yao
    Kou, Yubo
    Ma, Renkai
    Wu, Yanlai
    Freeman, Guo
    Semaan, Bryan
    [J]. COMPANION PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 ACM DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DIS COMPANION 2023, 2023, : 121 - 123
  • [9] Motivation and participation in multi-stakeholder innovation platforms in the Great Lakes Region of Africa
    Mulema, Annet Abenakyo
    Mazur, Robert Edward
    [J]. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 51 (02) : 212 - 228
  • [10] A life cycle model of multi-stakeholder networks
    Roloff, Julia
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2008, 17 (03) : 311 - 325