Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives

被引:0
|
作者
Anica Zeyen
Markus Beckmann
Stella Wolters
机构
[1] Royal Holloway University of London,School of Management
[2] Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,Chair for Corporate Sustainability Management, Institute of Management
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 135卷
关键词
Business self-regulation; Global governance; Management of diverse interests; Multi-stakeholder initiatives; Political role of the firm; Soft law; Club theory; Institutional theory; Institutional entrepreneurship;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As forms of private self-regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have emerged as an important empirical phenomenon in global governance processes. At the same time, MSIs are also theoretically intriguing because of their inherent double nature. On the one hand, MSIs spell out CSR standards that define norms for corporate behavior. On the other hand, MSIs are also the resultof corporate and stakeholder behavior. We combine the perspectives of institutional theory and club theory to conceptualize this double nature of MSIs. Based on a stage model that looks at the interplay of actor and institutional dynamics, we generate insights into why actors join a voluntary MSI, how the various motivations and intentions of the actors influence the standard development, and how these as well as the MSI design are subsequently influenced by both external (institutional) and internal (club) dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 360
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
    Zeyen, Anica
    Beckmann, Markus
    Wolters, Stella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 135 (02) : 341 - 360
  • [2] Ownership dynamics in local multi-stakeholder initiatives
    Biekart, Kees
    Fowler, Alan
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2018, 39 (09) : 1692 - 1710
  • [3] Mapping actor networks in global multi-stakeholder initiatives for food system transformation
    van den Akker, Amber
    Fabbri, Alice
    Slater, Scott
    Gilmore, Anna B.
    Knai, Cecile
    Rutter, Harry
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2024, 16 (05) : 1223 - 1234
  • [4] Intraorganizational Bargaining in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
    [J]. NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 31 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [5] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER INITIATIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERLOCUTORS
    Fowler, Alan
    Biekart, Kees
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (02) : 81 - 93
  • [6] Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work
    Kruuse, Mikkel
    Tangbaek, Kasper Reming
    Jespersen, Kristjan
    Gallemore, Caleb
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [7] Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Mena, Sebastien
    Palazzo, Guido
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (03) : 527 - 556
  • [8] Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?
    Tanimoto, Kanji
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (04): : 704 - 716
  • [9] Internationalization and firm performance: moderating role of multi-stakeholder initiatives
    Park, Sang-Bum
    [J]. MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2023, 31 (04) : 518 - 544
  • [10] Governance transference and shifting capacities and expectations in multi-stakeholder initiatives
    Jarvela, Johanna
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2024,