Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives

被引:0
|
作者
Anica Zeyen
Markus Beckmann
Stella Wolters
机构
[1] Royal Holloway University of London,School of Management
[2] Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,Chair for Corporate Sustainability Management, Institute of Management
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 135卷
关键词
Business self-regulation; Global governance; Management of diverse interests; Multi-stakeholder initiatives; Political role of the firm; Soft law; Club theory; Institutional theory; Institutional entrepreneurship;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As forms of private self-regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have emerged as an important empirical phenomenon in global governance processes. At the same time, MSIs are also theoretically intriguing because of their inherent double nature. On the one hand, MSIs spell out CSR standards that define norms for corporate behavior. On the other hand, MSIs are also the resultof corporate and stakeholder behavior. We combine the perspectives of institutional theory and club theory to conceptualize this double nature of MSIs. Based on a stage model that looks at the interplay of actor and institutional dynamics, we generate insights into why actors join a voluntary MSI, how the various motivations and intentions of the actors influence the standard development, and how these as well as the MSI design are subsequently influenced by both external (institutional) and internal (club) dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 360
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deliberation Without Democracy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Pragmatic Way Forward
    Rob Barlow
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 181 : 543 - 561
  • [22] Breaking the Cycle of Marginalization: How to Involve Local Communities in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives?
    Manon Eikelenboom
    Thomas B. Long
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 186 : 31 - 62
  • [23] Multi-stakeholder engagement
    Blenkus, M. Gabrijelcic
    Kronegger, L.
    Pushkarev, N.
    Robnik, M.
    Sotlar, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [25] Multi-stakeholder initiatives in sustainable supply chains: Putting sustainability performance in context
    Searcy, Cory
    [J]. ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2017, 5
  • [26] Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives
    Koen Kusters
    Louise Buck
    Maartje de Graaf
    Peter Minang
    Cora van Oosten
    Roderick Zagt
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2018, 62 : 170 - 181
  • [27] Can Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Improve Global Supply Chains? Improving Deliberative Capacity with a Stakeholder Orientation
    Soundararajan, Vivek
    Brown, Jill A.
    Wicks, Andrew C.
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2019, 29 (03) : 385 - 412
  • [28] Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
    Sartas, Murat
    Schut, Marc
    Hermans, Frans
    van Asten, Piet
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [29] Paradigm Shift or Business as Usual? Workers' Views on Multi-stakeholder Initiatives in Bangladesh
    Kabeer, Naila
    Huq, Lopita
    Sulaiman, Munshi
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (05) : 1360 - 1398
  • [30] Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives
    Kusters, Koen
    Buck, Louise
    de Graaf, Maartje
    Minang, Peter
    van Oosten, Cora
    Zagt, Roderick
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 62 (01) : 170 - 181