Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies

被引:40
|
作者
Steigenberger, Caroline [1 ]
Flatscher-Thoeni, Magdalena [1 ]
Siebert, Uwe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leiter, Andrea M. [5 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Asses, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] ONCOTYROL, Div Hlth Technol Assessment, Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Dept Radiol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Fac Econ & Stat, Dept Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 09期
关键词
Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Public health; Sociodemographic determinants; Economic valuation; Literature review; COVID-19; VACCINATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; PRIVATE DEMAND; CARE; PREFERENCES; DISEASE; POPULATION; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Introduction Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains. Results We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information. Conclusion Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1482
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    Berrens, RP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03): : 173 - 195
  • [42] Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada
    Poder, Thomas G.
    He, Jie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 16 (04) : 337 - 361
  • [43] Methodological influences on ecosystem valuation: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies
    Ann-Chyi, T.
    Sheau-Ting, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2024,
  • [44] Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada
    Thomas G. Poder
    Jie He
    [J]. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 2016, 16 : 337 - 361
  • [45] Willingness to pay for improved public health care services in Saudi Arabia: a contingent valuation study among heads of Saudi households
    Al-Hanawi, Mohammed K.
    Alsharqi, Omar
    Vaidya, Kirit
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2020, 15 (01) : 72 - 93
  • [46] Examination of Loss Aversion and Its Role in Willingness to Pay for Leisure Services Using the Contingent Valuation Method
    Lee, Won Seok
    Moon, Joonho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2018, 19 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [47] Knowledge, Attitudes, and Willingness to Pay For Sewerage and Sanitation Services: A Contingent Valuation Survey in Metro Manila, Philippines
    Palanca-Tan, Rosalina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 18 (02): : 44 - 52
  • [48] Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents
    Krupnick, A
    Alberini, A
    Cropper, M
    Simon, N
    O'Brien, B
    Goeree, R
    Heintzelman, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2002, 24 (02) : 161 - 186
  • [49] Use of Contingent Valuation to Elicit Willingness-to-Pay for the Benefits of Developmental Health Risk Reductions
    von Stackelberg, Katherine
    Hammitt, James
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 43 (01): : 45 - 61
  • [50] Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Health Risk Reductions of Pesticide Use in China: A Contingent Valuation Study
    Wang, Wenyu
    Jin, Jianjun
    He, Rui
    Gong, Haozhou
    Tian, Yuhong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (04):