Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies

被引:40
|
作者
Steigenberger, Caroline [1 ]
Flatscher-Thoeni, Magdalena [1 ]
Siebert, Uwe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leiter, Andrea M. [5 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Asses, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] ONCOTYROL, Div Hlth Technol Assessment, Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Dept Radiol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Fac Econ & Stat, Dept Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 09期
关键词
Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Public health; Sociodemographic determinants; Economic valuation; Literature review; COVID-19; VACCINATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; PRIVATE DEMAND; CARE; PREFERENCES; DISEASE; POPULATION; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Introduction Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains. Results We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information. Conclusion Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1482
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Turkey
    Dogan E.
    Muhammad I.
    [J]. Electricity Journal, 2019, 32 (10):
  • [32] Willingness to Pay for Hospice Care Using the Contingent Valuation Method
    Kim, Mee-Ok
    Lee, Kun-Sei
    Kim, Jung-Hoe
    Joo, Ji-Soo
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (03) : 510 - 521
  • [33] Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Kwak, So-Yoon
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5408 - 5416
  • [34] Europeans' willingness to pay for ending homelessness: a contingent valuation study
    Loubiere, Sandrine
    Tinland, A.
    Taylor, O.
    Loundou, A.
    Auquier, P.
    Ornelas, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 : 39 - 39
  • [35] Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
    Alok K. Bohara
    Joe Kerkvliet
    Robert P. Berrens
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 20 : 173 - 195
  • [36] Europeans' willingness to pay for ending homelessness: A contingent valuation study
    Loubiere, Sandrine
    Taylor, Owen
    Tinland, Aurelie
    Vargas-Moniz, Maria
    O'Shaughnessy, Branagh
    Bokszczanin, Anna
    Kallmen, Hakan
    Bernad, Roberto
    Wolf, Judith
    Santinello, Massimo
    Loundou, Anderson
    Ornelas, Jose
    Auquier, Pascal
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 247
  • [37] Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods
    Green, D
    Jacowitz, KE
    Kahneman, D
    McFadden, D
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) : 85 - 116
  • [38] Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity
    Cawley, John
    [J]. ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (02) : 281 - 292
  • [39] Contingent valuation and willingness to pay for credence attributes in beef meat
    Jaramillo Villanueva, Jose Luis
    Vargas Lopez, Samuel
    Rojas Juarez, Lissete Abigail
    [J]. REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2018, 9 (01) : 14 - 31
  • [40] Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation
    Blomquist, GC
    Whitehead, JC
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) : 179 - 196