Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies

被引:40
|
作者
Steigenberger, Caroline [1 ]
Flatscher-Thoeni, Magdalena [1 ]
Siebert, Uwe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leiter, Andrea M. [5 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Asses, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] ONCOTYROL, Div Hlth Technol Assessment, Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Dept Radiol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Fac Econ & Stat, Dept Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 09期
关键词
Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Public health; Sociodemographic determinants; Economic valuation; Literature review; COVID-19; VACCINATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; PRIVATE DEMAND; CARE; PREFERENCES; DISEASE; POPULATION; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Introduction Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains. Results We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information. Conclusion Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1482
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social willingness to pay, mortality risks and contingent valuation
    Armantier, O
    Treich, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2004, 29 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [22] Willingness to pay for inhaled insulinA contingent valuation approach
    Hamid Sadri
    Linda D. MacKeigan
    Lawrence A. Leiter
    Thomas R. Einarson
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2005, 23 : 1215 - 1227
  • [23] Social Willingness to Pay, Mortality Risks and Contingent Valuation
    Olivier Armantier
    Nicolas Treich
    [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2004, 29 : 7 - 19
  • [24] Determinants of Visitors' Willingness to Pay for Enhanced Ecosystem Services in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India: A Contingent Valuation Approach
    Rajkumar, V
    Boopathi, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (03): : 443 - 474
  • [25] Determinants of households' willingness to pay for the conservation of church forests in northwestern Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study
    Endalew, Birara
    Wondimagegnhu, Beneberu Assefa
    [J]. COGENT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [26] Bias in valuation of health care benefits in metastatic prostate cancer: A contingent valuation of willingness to pay.
    Sousa, Nuno
    Costa, Telma
    Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
    Goncalves, Francisco Rocha
    Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [27] Eliciting several willingness to pay in a single contingent valuation survey:: application to health care
    Luchini, S
    Protière, C
    Moatti, JP
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [28] Willingness to pay for the preservation of geothermal areas in Iceland - The contingent valuation studies of Eldvorp and Hverahlio
    Cook, David
    Daviosdottir, Brynhildur
    Kristofersson, Daoi Mar
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 116 : 97 - 108
  • [29] Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error
    Oerlemans, Leon A. G.
    Chan, Kai-Ying
    Volschenk, Jako
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 66 : 875 - 885
  • [30] Europeans' willingness to pay for ending homelessness: a contingent valuation study
    Loubiere, Sandrine
    Tinland, A.
    Taylor, O.
    Loundou, A.
    Auquier, P.
    Ornelas, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 : 39 - 39