Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies

被引:40
|
作者
Steigenberger, Caroline [1 ]
Flatscher-Thoeni, Magdalena [1 ]
Siebert, Uwe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leiter, Andrea M. [5 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Asses, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] ONCOTYROL, Div Hlth Technol Assessment, Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Dept Radiol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Fac Econ & Stat, Dept Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 09期
关键词
Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Public health; Sociodemographic determinants; Economic valuation; Literature review; COVID-19; VACCINATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; PRIVATE DEMAND; CARE; PREFERENCES; DISEASE; POPULATION; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Introduction Stated preference studies are a valuable tool to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods or services, especially in situations where no market valuation exists. Contingent valuation (CV) is a widely used approach among stated-preference techniques for eliciting WTP if prices do not exist or do not reflect actual costs, for example, when services are covered by insurance. This review aimed to provide an overview of relevant factors determining WTP for health services to support variable selection. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search and review of CV studies assessing determinants of WTP for health services was conducted, including 11 electronic databases. Two of the authors made independent decisions on the eligibility of studies. We extracted all determinants used and related p values for the effect sizes (e.g. reported in regression models with WTP for a health service as outcome variable). Determinants were summarised in systematic evidence tables and structured by thematic domains. Results We identified 2082 publications, of which 202 full texts were checked for eligibility. We included 62 publications on 61 studies in the review. Across all studies, we identified 22 WTP determinants and other factors from 5 thematic domains: sociodemographic characteristics, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and other information. Conclusion Our review provides evidence on 22 relevant determinants of WTP for health services, which may be used for variable selection and as guidance for planning CV surveys. Endogeneity should be carefully considered before interpreting these determinants as causal factors and potential intervention targets.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1482
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies
    Caroline Steigenberger
    Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni
    Uwe Siebert
    Andrea M. Leiter
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2022, 23 : 1455 - 1482
  • [2] WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE USING THE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Al-Hanawi, M.
    Almazrou, S.
    Alsharif, M.
    Yunusa, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S773 - S773
  • [3] Socioeconomic Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Emergency Public Dental Services in Saudi Arabia: A Contingent Valuation Approach
    Hawsawi, Halah Saleh
    Immurana, Mustapha
    Al-Hanawi, Mohammed Khaled
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
  • [4] Willingness-to pay for mental health: A contingent valuation study
    Gannon, Brenda
    Kennelly, Brendan
    O'Shea, Eamon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 10 : S15 - S15
  • [5] Willingness to pay for school counselling services in Japan: a contingent valuation study
    Sueki, Hajime
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 7 (1-2) : 15 - 25
  • [6] WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES: A REVIEW OF THE CONTINGENT VALUATION LITERATURE
    Lin, P. J.
    Cangelosi, M. J.
    Lee, D. W.
    Neumann, P. J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A38 - A38
  • [7] Willingness to Pay for Diagnostic Technologies: A Review of the Contingent Valuation Literature
    Lin, Pei-Jung
    Cangelosi, Michael J.
    Lee, David W.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (05) : 797 - 805
  • [8] TAXPAYER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM: A CONTINGENT VALUATION ANALYSIS
    Lavetti, Kurt
    Simon, Kosali
    White, William D.
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2014, 52 (03) : 994 - 1013
  • [9] Willingness to Pay For Health Insurance in Sarawak, Malaysia: A Contingent Valuation Method
    Azhar, A.
    Rahman, M. M.
    Arif, M. T.
    [J]. BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 17 (02): : 230 - 237
  • [10] Willingness to pay for complementary health insurance in Iran: Contingent valuation approach
    Mohammadi, Behzad
    Goudarzi, Reza
    Amiresmaili, Mohammadreza
    Barouni, Mohsen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37 (03): : 1816 - 1826