A systematic review of moving bed biofilm reactor, membrane bioreactor, and moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Comparison of research trends, removal mechanisms, and performance

被引:58
|
作者
Saidulu, Duduku [1 ]
Majumder, Abhradeep [2 ]
Gupta, Ashok Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Environm Engn Div, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
来源
关键词
Bibliometric mapping; Biological treatment; Life cycle assessment; Membrane fouling; Network visualization; Treatment mechanism; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENGINEERING APPLICATION; PARTIAL NITRITATION; GREYWATER TREATMENT; FOULING MITIGATION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; ORGANIC-MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The various detrimental effects of wastewater generated from different anthropogenic activities are among the biggest challenges to sustainable development. Among various technologies developed to tackle wastewater, biological treatment methods, such as moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR), have been extensively used in the past few decades due to their cost-effectiveness, wide applications, technical feasibility, etc. However, certain limitations of MBR and MBBR have led to the hybridization of these two technologies. In this context, a thorough bibliometric assay of MBBR, MBR, and hybrid moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR) has been performed to analyze the current trends in publication, contributing authors and countries, major research hotspots, etc. It was observed that for both MBBR and MBR, China had the maximum contribution, i.e., 30.4% and 30.5%, respectively, in terms of the number of publications. The future trend of the selected treatment methods was assessed with the help of S-curve simulation. In both cases, greater than 70% of research articles were published in the last decade, which may be due to the increasingly stringent regulations on effluent quality. Subsequently, this study investigated the performance and responsible mechanisms for these systems. MBMBR was found to be more effective than MBR in terms of pollutant removal, followed by MBBR. The nutrient removal efficiency of MBMBR systems was significantly higher (73.5%) as compared to MBBR (50%) and MBR (62.5%). Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been discussed for the selected treatment methods to evaluate sustainability aspects.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON BETWEEN A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR, A HYBRID MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A PURE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON MEMBRANE FOULING
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Fenice, M.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 1502 - 1508
  • [2] Performance Comparison of Conventional Membrane Bioreactor and Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Synthetic Textile Wastewater
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 528 - 532
  • [3] Development of an Integrated Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor-Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment
    Duan, Liang
    Song, Yonghui
    Jiang, Wei
    Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, PTS 1-3, 2013, 361-363 : 611 - +
  • [4] A review on the present situation of wastewater treatment in textile industry with membrane bioreactor and moving bed biofilm reactor
    Yang, Xuefei
    Crespi, Marti
    Lopez-Grimau, Victor
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 103 : 315 - 322
  • [5] Performance of a membrane bioreactor and a moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor treating table olive processing wastewater: a comparative study
    Patsios, Sotiris, I
    Kontogiannopoulos, Konstantinos N.
    Pouliou, Niki
    Karabelas, Anastasios J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 96 (04) : 1030 - 1039
  • [6] Reuse of textile wastewater treated by moving bed biofilm reactor coupled with membrane bioreactor
    Yang, Xuefei
    Lopez-Grimau, Victor
    Vilaseca, Mercedes
    Crespi, Marti
    Ribera-Pi, Judit
    Calderer, Montse
    Martinez-Llado, Xavier
    COLORATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 137 (05) : 484 - 492
  • [7] Performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor and moving bed membrane bioreactor for synthetic textile wastewater treatment
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2020, 38
  • [8] Influence of the temperature in the permeate flux of the membrane in a membrane bioreactor with moving bed biofilm reactor
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Rodriguez, F. A.
    Reboleiro-Rivas, P.
    Gonzalez-Lopez, J.
    Hontoria, E.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 275 - 277
  • [9] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (24) : 6655 - 6657
  • [10] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (08) : 2369 - 2374