Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal

被引:136
|
作者
Yang, Shuai [1 ]
Yang, Fenglin [1 ]
Fu, Zhimin [1 ]
Lei, Ruibo [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Environm & Biol Sci & Technol, MOE, Key Lab Ind Ecol & Environm Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
关键词
Moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR); Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR); Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND); Specific oxygen utilization rate (SOUR); Membrane fouling; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; SIMULTANEOUS NITRIFICATION; BF-MBR; DENITRIFICATION; FILTRATION; PERFORMANCE; SEPARATION; RETENTION; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.022
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A membrane bioreactor filled with carriers instead of activated sludge named a moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR) was investigated for simultaneously removing organic carbon and nitrogen in wastewater. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 8.9-22.1. The operational parameters were optimized to increase the treatment efficiency. COD removal efficiency averaged at 95.6% and 96.2%, respectively, for MBMBR and CMBR during the 4 months experimental period. The MBMBR system demonstrated good performance on nitrogen removal at different COD/TIN ratios. When COD/TN was 8.9 and the total nitrogen (TN) load was 7.58 mg/l h, the TN and ammonium nitrogen removal efficiencies of the MBMBR were maintained over 70.0% and 80.0%, respectively, and the removed total nitrogen (TN) load reached to 5.31 mg/l h. Multifunctional microbial reactions in the carrier, such as simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND), play important roles in nitrogen removal. In comparison, the CMBR did not perform so well. Its TN removal was not stable, and the removed total nitrogen (TN) load was only 1.02 mg/l h at COD/TN ratio 8.9. The specific oxygen utilization rate (SOUR) showed that the biofilm has a better microbial activity than an activated sludge. Nevertheless, the membrane fouling behavior was more severe in the MBMBR than in the CMBR due to a thick and dense cake layer formed on the membrane surface, which was speculated to be caused by the filamentous bacteria in the MBMBR. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:2369 / 2374
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (24) : 6655 - 6657
  • [2] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Liang Duan
    Shan Li
    Lu Han
    Yonghui Song
    Beihai Zhou
    Jing Zhang
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4881 - 4890
  • [3] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Duan, Liang
    Li, Shan
    Han, Lu
    Song, Yonghui
    Zhou, Beihai
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4881 - 4890
  • [4] Performance Comparison of Conventional Membrane Bioreactor and Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Synthetic Textile Wastewater
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    [J]. 5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 528 - 532
  • [5] COMPARISON BETWEEN A FLUIDIZED BED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    Ma, Jin-xia
    Yang, Xiao-li
    Wang, Shi-he
    Guo, Yang
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (4A): : 1157 - 1162
  • [6] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community
    Liang Duan
    Yuan Tian
    Xiaoling Liu
    Yonghui Song
    Liu Yang
    Jing Zhang
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4891 - 4902
  • [7] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community
    Duan, Liang
    Tian, Yuan
    Liu, Xiaoling
    Song, Yonghui
    Yang, Liu
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4891 - 4902
  • [8] COMPARISON BETWEEN A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR, A HYBRID MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A PURE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON MEMBRANE FOULING
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Fenice, M.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 1502 - 1508
  • [9] Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor
    Zhang, HM
    Xiao, JN
    Cheng, YJ
    Liu, LF
    Zhang, XW
    Yang, FL
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 41 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [10] Performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor and moving bed membrane bioreactor for synthetic textile wastewater treatment
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2020, 38