Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community

被引:16
|
作者
Duan, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Yuan [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Xiaoling [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yonghui [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Liu [3 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Dept Urban Water Environm Res, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol, Coll Geosci & Surveying Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Membrane bioreactor; Integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactor; Bacterial community; Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Clone library; WASTE-WATER; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; BIOFILM REACTOR; MBR; NITRIFICATION; BERBERINE; INTERFACE; DIVERSITY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-015-4245-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactor (IFAS-MBR) has been developed as alternative to activated sludge-based membrane bioreactor (MBR) process. However, the characteristics of bacterial community in IFAS-MBR are still not fully understood. The objective of this study is to compare the bacterial community changes and structures between IFAS-MBR and MBR. The dominant, shared and functional species were also analyzed to characterize the bacterial communities in two MBRs. The results showed that two systems had excellent removal efficiencies of COD and NH4+-N. The microbes in IFAS-MBR can achieve the highest diversity at shorter time, and the IFAS-MBR had a better ability to resist the shock temperature than the MBR. The clone libraries results showed that the bacterial community compositions in two MBRs were significantly different. Betaproteobacteria was the predominant group in IFAS-MBR, but Gammaproteobacteria was the main group in MBR. Bacteroidetes was the subdominant group in MBR, but it only occupied small proportion in IFAS-MBR. Moreover, 21 OTUs were shared between the bacterial community of MBR and IFAS-MBR.
引用
收藏
页码:4891 / 4902
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community
    Liang Duan
    Yuan Tian
    Xiaoling Liu
    Yonghui Song
    Liu Yang
    Jing Zhang
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4891 - 4902
  • [2] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Duan, Liang
    Li, Shan
    Han, Lu
    Song, Yonghui
    Zhou, Beihai
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4881 - 4890
  • [3] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Liang Duan
    Shan Li
    Lu Han
    Yonghui Song
    Beihai Zhou
    Jing Zhang
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4881 - 4890
  • [4] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (24) : 6655 - 6657
  • [5] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: Influence of wastewater salinity variation
    Di Trapani, Daniele
    Di Bella, Gaetano
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Torregrossa, Michele
    Viviani, Gaspare
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 162 : 60 - 69
  • [6] Treatment of textile wastewater in a single-step moving bed-membrane bioreactor: Comparison with conventional membrane bioreactor in terms of performance and membrane fouling
    Tecirli, Emine Sule
    Akgun, Kadir
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    [J]. WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 38 (03) : 465 - 480
  • [7] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (08) : 2369 - 2374
  • [8] Performance Comparison of Conventional Membrane Bioreactor and Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Synthetic Textile Wastewater
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    [J]. 5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 528 - 532
  • [9] COMPARISON BETWEEN A FLUIDIZED BED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    Ma, Jin-xia
    Yang, Xiao-li
    Wang, Shi-he
    Guo, Yang
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (4A): : 1157 - 1162
  • [10] COMPARISON BETWEEN A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR, A HYBRID MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A PURE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON MEMBRANE FOULING
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Fenice, M.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 1502 - 1508