A systematic review of moving bed biofilm reactor, membrane bioreactor, and moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Comparison of research trends, removal mechanisms, and performance

被引:58
|
作者
Saidulu, Duduku [1 ]
Majumder, Abhradeep [2 ]
Gupta, Ashok Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Environm Engn Div, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
来源
关键词
Bibliometric mapping; Biological treatment; Life cycle assessment; Membrane fouling; Network visualization; Treatment mechanism; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENGINEERING APPLICATION; PARTIAL NITRITATION; GREYWATER TREATMENT; FOULING MITIGATION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; ORGANIC-MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The various detrimental effects of wastewater generated from different anthropogenic activities are among the biggest challenges to sustainable development. Among various technologies developed to tackle wastewater, biological treatment methods, such as moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR), have been extensively used in the past few decades due to their cost-effectiveness, wide applications, technical feasibility, etc. However, certain limitations of MBR and MBBR have led to the hybridization of these two technologies. In this context, a thorough bibliometric assay of MBBR, MBR, and hybrid moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR) has been performed to analyze the current trends in publication, contributing authors and countries, major research hotspots, etc. It was observed that for both MBBR and MBR, China had the maximum contribution, i.e., 30.4% and 30.5%, respectively, in terms of the number of publications. The future trend of the selected treatment methods was assessed with the help of S-curve simulation. In both cases, greater than 70% of research articles were published in the last decade, which may be due to the increasingly stringent regulations on effluent quality. Subsequently, this study investigated the performance and responsible mechanisms for these systems. MBMBR was found to be more effective than MBR in terms of pollutant removal, followed by MBBR. The nutrient removal efficiency of MBMBR systems was significantly higher (73.5%) as compared to MBBR (50%) and MBR (62.5%). Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been discussed for the selected treatment methods to evaluate sustainability aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Duan, Liang
    Li, Shan
    Han, Lu
    Song, Yonghui
    Zhou, Beihai
    Zhang, Jing
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4881 - 4890
  • [42] Impacts of sulfadiazine on the performance and membrane fouling of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system at different C/N ratios
    Zhang, Xinbo
    Zhang, Zumin
    Liu, Ying
    Huu Hao Ngo
    Guo, Wenshan
    Wang, Huizhong
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Zhang, Dan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 318
  • [43] Microbial Kinetics and Enzymatic Activities in Hybrid Moving-Bed Biofilm Reactor-Membrane Bioreactor Systems
    Carlos Leyva-Diaz, Juan
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Alejandro
    Calderon, Kadiya
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Jesus
    del Mar Munio, Maria
    Manuel Poyatos, Jose
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 (06) : 1067 - 1076
  • [44] The characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor
    Duan, Liang
    Jiang, Wei
    Song, Yonghui
    Xia, Siqing
    Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 148 : 436 - 442
  • [45] Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost
    Udomkittayachai, Nutkritta
    Xue, Wenchao
    Xiao, Kang
    Visvanathan, Chettiyappan
    Tabucanon, Allan Sriratana
    Water Research, 2021, 188
  • [46] Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost
    Udomkittayachai, Nutkritta
    Xue, Wenchao
    Xiao, Kang
    Visvanathan, Chettiyappan
    Tabucanon, Allan Sriratana
    WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 188
  • [47] Design of a carrier for wastewater treatment using moving bed bioreactor
    Martinez-Huerta, Gemma
    Prendes-Gero, Belen
    Ortega-Fernandez, Francisco
    Manuel Mesa-Fernandez, Jose
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING: ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, : 44 - 49
  • [48] The effect of the solids and hydraulic retention time on moving bed membrane bioreactor performance
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Capodici, Marco
    Cosenza, Alida
    Di Trapani, Daniele
    Ekama, George A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 170 : 1305 - 1315
  • [49] Laundry wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor
    Altenbaher, Brigita
    Levstek, Marjetka
    Neral, Branko
    Turk, Sonja Sostar
    TEKSTIL, 2010, 59 (08): : 333 - 339
  • [50] Dairy wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor
    Andreottola, G
    Foladori, P
    Ragazzi, M
    Villa, R
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (12) : 321 - 328