A systematic review of moving bed biofilm reactor, membrane bioreactor, and moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Comparison of research trends, removal mechanisms, and performance

被引:58
|
作者
Saidulu, Duduku [1 ]
Majumder, Abhradeep [2 ]
Gupta, Ashok Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Environm Engn Div, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
来源
关键词
Bibliometric mapping; Biological treatment; Life cycle assessment; Membrane fouling; Network visualization; Treatment mechanism; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENGINEERING APPLICATION; PARTIAL NITRITATION; GREYWATER TREATMENT; FOULING MITIGATION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; ORGANIC-MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The various detrimental effects of wastewater generated from different anthropogenic activities are among the biggest challenges to sustainable development. Among various technologies developed to tackle wastewater, biological treatment methods, such as moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR), have been extensively used in the past few decades due to their cost-effectiveness, wide applications, technical feasibility, etc. However, certain limitations of MBR and MBBR have led to the hybridization of these two technologies. In this context, a thorough bibliometric assay of MBBR, MBR, and hybrid moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR) has been performed to analyze the current trends in publication, contributing authors and countries, major research hotspots, etc. It was observed that for both MBBR and MBR, China had the maximum contribution, i.e., 30.4% and 30.5%, respectively, in terms of the number of publications. The future trend of the selected treatment methods was assessed with the help of S-curve simulation. In both cases, greater than 70% of research articles were published in the last decade, which may be due to the increasingly stringent regulations on effluent quality. Subsequently, this study investigated the performance and responsible mechanisms for these systems. MBMBR was found to be more effective than MBR in terms of pollutant removal, followed by MBBR. The nutrient removal efficiency of MBMBR systems was significantly higher (73.5%) as compared to MBBR (50%) and MBR (62.5%). Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been discussed for the selected treatment methods to evaluate sustainability aspects.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of the performance of the combined moving bed bioreactor-membrane bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) for textile wastewater treatment
    Uddin, Mohsin
    Islam, Md Khayrul
    Dev, Shubra
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [22] Kinetic study of the combined processes of a membrane bioreactor and a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor with advanced oxidation processes as a post-treatment stage for wastewater treatment
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Lopez-Lopez, C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2015, 91 : 57 - 66
  • [23] Anaerobic/anoxic/oxic configuration in hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor for nutrient removal from municipal wastewater
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Munio, M. M.
    Gonzalez-Lopez, J.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 91 : 449 - 458
  • [24] Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal by a novel sequencing batch moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Wang, Tao
    Lei, Ruibo
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 175 (1-3) : 551 - 557
  • [25] Effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system for micropollutants removal from municipal wastewater
    Jiang, Qi
    Ngo, Hao H.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Hai, Faisal I.
    Price, William E.
    Zhang, Jian
    Liang, Shuang
    Deng, Lijuan
    Guo, Wenshan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 247 : 1228 - 1232
  • [26] New functional biocarriers for enhancing the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system
    Deng, Lijuan
    Guo, Wenshan
    Huu Hao Ngo
    Zhang, Xinbo
    Wang, Xiaochang C.
    Zhang, Qionghua
    Chen, Rong
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 208 : 87 - 93
  • [27] COMPARISON BETWEEN A FLUIDIZED BED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    Ma, Jin-xia
    Yang, Xiao-li
    Wang, Shi-he
    Guo, Yang
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (4A): : 1157 - 1162
  • [28] Dye wastewater treatment and membrane fouling in a moving bed-UV-photocatalytically modified membrane bioreactor
    Luo, Jing
    Liu, Tingxi
    Chen, Weiwei
    Dong, Caixia
    Liu, Jianguo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 10 (10) : 2478 - 2490
  • [29] Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater
    Alharthi, Mamdouh S.
    Bamaga, Omar
    Abulkhair, Hani
    Organji, Husam
    Shaiban, Amer
    Macedonio, Francesca
    Criscuoli, Alessandra
    Drioli, Enrico
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Cui, Zhaoliang
    Jin, Wanqin
    Albeirutty, Mohammed
    MEMBRANES, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [30] Treatment of Medical Wastewater by Moving Bed Bioreactor System
    Jasem, Yaser I.
    Jumaha, Ghufran F.
    Ghawi, Ali Hadi
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 19 (03): : 135 - 140