Treatment of elbow periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

被引:9
|
作者
Gutman, Michael J. [1 ]
Stone, Michael A. [2 ]
Namdari, Surena [2 ]
Abboud, Joseph A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Periprosthetic joint infection; total elbow arthroplasty; infected arthroplasty; revision elbow arthroplasty; 1; stage; 2; resection arthroplasty; RESECTION ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION; DECOLONIZATION; PROSTHESIS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the elbow is a relatively common complication after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), and its treatment is frequently variable. Few articles have provided direct comparisons of outcomes, making it difficult to draw conclusions from the available literature. This systematic review synthesizes the English-language literature on elbow PM to quantify treatment outcomes. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched in December 2018. Our review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Keywords included "elbow replacement infection" and "elbow arthroplasty infection." A total of 1056 titles were identified; after application of the exclusion criteria, 41 studies met the screening criteria and underwent full-text review. Fifteen articles were included for the final analysis regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, infecting organisms, success of eradication of infection based on surgical method, and functional outcomes of specific treatment regimens. Results: Among the 15 articles selected, there were 309 TEA infections. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism (42A%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (32.6%). Risk factors for the development of elbow PJI included rheumatoid arthritis, steroid use, an immunocompromised state, and previous elbow surgery. The rate of successful infection eradication was highest with 2stage revision (81.2%) and lowest with irrigation and debridement for component retention (55.8%). The level of evidence was IV in 14 studies and III in 1 study. Conclusions: In this systematic review of TEA infections, Staphylococcus species represent the most common infecting organism. Two-stage revision was the most effective treatment for elbow PJI, showing the lowest recurrence rate for infection. (C) 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Joint replacement surgery for elbow tumours: a systematic review of outcomes
    Manoharan, Gopikanthan
    Jordan, Robert W.
    Orfanos, Georgios
    Cheruvu, Manikandar S.
    Cool, Paul
    Hay, Stuart M.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2021, 13 (06) : 656 - 670
  • [22] Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Jakobs, Oliver
    Schoof, Benjamin
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Schmidl, Stefan
    Fensky, Florian
    Guenther, Daniel
    Frommelt, Lars
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Gebauer, Matthias
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [23] Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Clinical and Bench
    Lee, Mel S.
    Freiberg, Andrew
    Klauser, Wolfgang
    Mow, Christopher S.
    Kim, Shin-Yoon
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
  • [24] Lack of Standardization in Treatment Outcomes for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Call to Action
    Tarabichi, Saad
    Verhey, Jens T.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Parvizi, Javad
    Bingham, Joshua S.
    Spangehl, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (01): : 6 - 7
  • [25] Treatment Outcomes and Attrition in Gram-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Kalbian, Irene L.
    Goswami, Karan
    Tan, Timothy L.
    John, Nathan
    Foltz, Carol
    Parvizi, Javad
    Arnold, William V.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (03): : 849 - 854
  • [26] Treatment Outcomes of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in HIV-Positive Patients
    Tryapichnikov, A. S.
    Ermakov, A. M.
    Klyushin, N. V.
    Ababkov, Yu. V.
    Stepanyan, A. B.
    Koyushkov, A. N.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2019, 25 (04): : 117 - 125
  • [27] Fungal periprosthetic joint infection following total elbow arthroplasty: A case report and review of the literature
    Kwong C.A.
    Puloski S.K.T.
    Hildebrand K.A.
    Journal of Medical Case Reports, 11 (1)
  • [28] Statistical Outcomes Guiding Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention and Revision Are Fragile: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yendluri, Avanish
    Gonzalez, Christopher
    Cordero, John K.
    Hayden, Brett L.
    Moucha, Calin S.
    Parisien, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (07): : 1869 - 1875
  • [29] Outcomes and risk factors for failure after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for elbow periprosthetic joint infection
    Tai, Don Bambino Geno
    Hanson, Sofia
    Brennan, Patrick
    Suh, Gina A.
    Esper, Ronda N.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (03) : 475 - 479
  • [30] Outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic shoulder infection: a systematic review
    Mercurio, Michele
    Castioni, Davide
    Ianno, Bruno
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Galasso, Olimpio
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (06) : 1193 - 1203