Treatment of elbow periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

被引:9
|
作者
Gutman, Michael J. [1 ]
Stone, Michael A. [2 ]
Namdari, Surena [2 ]
Abboud, Joseph A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Periprosthetic joint infection; total elbow arthroplasty; infected arthroplasty; revision elbow arthroplasty; 1; stage; 2; resection arthroplasty; RESECTION ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION; DECOLONIZATION; PROSTHESIS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the elbow is a relatively common complication after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), and its treatment is frequently variable. Few articles have provided direct comparisons of outcomes, making it difficult to draw conclusions from the available literature. This systematic review synthesizes the English-language literature on elbow PM to quantify treatment outcomes. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched in December 2018. Our review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Keywords included "elbow replacement infection" and "elbow arthroplasty infection." A total of 1056 titles were identified; after application of the exclusion criteria, 41 studies met the screening criteria and underwent full-text review. Fifteen articles were included for the final analysis regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, infecting organisms, success of eradication of infection based on surgical method, and functional outcomes of specific treatment regimens. Results: Among the 15 articles selected, there were 309 TEA infections. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism (42A%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (32.6%). Risk factors for the development of elbow PJI included rheumatoid arthritis, steroid use, an immunocompromised state, and previous elbow surgery. The rate of successful infection eradication was highest with 2stage revision (81.2%) and lowest with irrigation and debridement for component retention (55.8%). The level of evidence was IV in 14 studies and III in 1 study. Conclusions: In this systematic review of TEA infections, Staphylococcus species represent the most common infecting organism. Two-stage revision was the most effective treatment for elbow PJI, showing the lowest recurrence rate for infection. (C) 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review of risk prediction scores for surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection following joint arthroplasty
    Kunutsor, S. K.
    Whitehouse, M. R.
    Blom, A. W.
    Beswick, A. D.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 145 (09): : 1738 - 1749
  • [32] NYU Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis and Treatment
    Arshi, Armin
    Pham, Vinh P.
    Rozell, Joshua C.
    Aggarwal, Vinay K.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2023, 81 (02): : 151 - 155
  • [33] Targeted next generation sequencing for elbow periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis
    Flurin, Laure
    Wolf, Matthew J.
    Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Patel, Robin
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (02)
  • [34] What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?: A Systematic Review
    Desai, Vineet
    Farid, Alexander R.
    Liimakka, Adriana P.
    Lora-Tamayo, Jaime
    Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
    Kuiper, Jesse W. P.
    Sandiford, Nemandra
    Chen, Antonia F.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [35] Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for periprosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Beswick, Andrew D.
    Whitehouse, MichaelR.
    Wylde, Vikki
    Blom, Ashley W.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2018, 77 (06) : 479 - 488
  • [36] Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review
    Aaron Gazendam
    Thomas J Wood
    Daniel Tushinski
    Kamal Bali
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2022, 15 : 219 - 229
  • [37] Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Clinical Challenges
    Nelson, Sandra B.
    Pinkney, Jodian A.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Tande, Aaron J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 77 (07) : e34 - e45
  • [38] Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review
    Tsikopoulos, Konstantinos
    Meroni, Gabriele
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (10):
  • [39] Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review
    Gazendam, Aaron
    Wood, Thomas J.
    Tushinski, Daniel
    Bali, Kamal
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (03) : 219 - 229
  • [40] Periprosthetic Infection in Joint Replacement Diagnosis and Treatment
    Otto-Lambertz, Christina
    Yagdiran, Ayla
    Wallscheid, Franziska
    Eysel, Peer
    Jung, Norma
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (20): : 347 - +