Dynamics of multibody systems in space environment; Lagrangian vs. Eulerian approach

被引:36
|
作者
Santini, P
Gasbarri, P
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Assoc Italiana Aeronaut & Astronaut, Rome, Italy
[2] Dipartimento Aerospaziale, Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00277-1
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The paper describes the motion of a multibody in space environment: by space environment we mean space-varying gravity, gradient forces, control forces, if any. (1) In the Eulerian approach, the motion of each individual member is described through kinematic parameters: (a) position of its CM with respect to the inertial frame; (b) rotation of the members with respect to the inertial frame; amplitude of the elastic modes (free-free). The said parameters are of different order of magnitudes, and therefore an adequate separation of them is highly desirable. Therefore, individual positions are replaced by overall position of the system (of the order of Earth's radius), and by the motion of each bar relative to it (of the order of members dimension), and for modes amplitudes modal equations are used. It should be noted, however, that the above-described motion parameters are redundant, and we must introduce: (a) reactions between members, (b) equations of compatibility of the same number of reactions. In summary, (i) the set of unknowns is: motion parameters, reactions, control forces; (ii) the equations are equilibrium, compatibility, control. Control is introduced by prescribing the motion of some members, produced by control moments of forces. By simple matrix algebra, it is reduced to a system with motion parameters (overall + local) only. (2) In the Lagrangian approach, motion parameters are selected which are already consistent with compatibility conditions. In this case, as customarily, the expression of kinetic, potential, elastic energy is written, and the application of Lagrangian techniques provides directly the solving system. No reactions and compatibility equations appear here, however; for control purpose, prescribed motion law must again be introduced. Comparison of the two approaches shows perfect agreement (as one should have expected), since they are both exact models referring to the same physical system. In general, however, the Eulerian approach lends itself to a better understanding of physical facts, in particular, of the entity of the reactions and of the corresponding structural stresses. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new approach of using null space of Jacobian matrix in simulation of multibody dynamics
    Van Phong Dinh
    Hai Nguyen Nguyen
    SIMULATION AND MODELING RELATED TO COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 37 : 44 - 58
  • [32] Dynamics systems vs. optimal control - a unifying view
    Schaal, Stefan
    Mohajerian, Peyman
    Ijspeert, Auke
    COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE: THEORETICAL INSIGHTS INTO BRAIN FUNCTION, 2007, 165 : 425 - 445
  • [33] Dynamics of fluid-filled space multibody systems considering the microgravity effects
    Kong, Weizhen
    Tian, Qiang
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2020, 148
  • [34] A peridynamics approach to flexible multibody dynamics for fracture analysis of mechanical systems
    Francisco Vieira
    João Pagaimo
    Hugo Magalhães
    Jorge Ambrósio
    Aurélio Araújo
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2024, 60 : 65 - 92
  • [35] A peridynamics approach to flexible multibody dynamics for fracture analysis of mechanical systems
    Vieira, Francisco
    Pagaimo, Joao
    Magalhaes, Hugo
    Ambrosio, Jorge
    Araujo, Aurelio
    MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2024, 60 (01) : 65 - 92
  • [36] Existence and stability of entropy solutions for the hyperbolic systems of isentropic gas dynamics in Eulerian add Lagrangian coordinates
    Lions, PL
    Perthame, B
    Souganidis, PE
    COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1996, 49 (06) : 599 - 638
  • [37] Testing of Automotive Systems - Complex vs. Simple Environment Models
    Sobotka, Jan
    Krejci, Lukas
    2018 16TH BIENNIAL BALTIC ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (BEC), 2018,
  • [38] A hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian-statistical approach to evaluate air quality in a mixed residential-industrial environment
    Bonafe, Giovanni
    Montanari, Francesco
    Stel, Fulvio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2018, 64 (1-3) : 246 - 264
  • [39] Time vs. space in fault-tolerant distributed systems
    Charron-Bost, B
    Défago, X
    Schiper, A
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OBJECT-ORIENTED REAL-TIME DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 21 - 27
  • [40] A minimum state multibody/FEM approach for modeling flexible orbiting space systems
    Pisculli, A.
    Gasbarri, P.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2015, 110 : 324 - 340