Dynamics of multibody systems in space environment; Lagrangian vs. Eulerian approach

被引:36
|
作者
Santini, P
Gasbarri, P
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Assoc Italiana Aeronaut & Astronaut, Rome, Italy
[2] Dipartimento Aerospaziale, Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00277-1
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The paper describes the motion of a multibody in space environment: by space environment we mean space-varying gravity, gradient forces, control forces, if any. (1) In the Eulerian approach, the motion of each individual member is described through kinematic parameters: (a) position of its CM with respect to the inertial frame; (b) rotation of the members with respect to the inertial frame; amplitude of the elastic modes (free-free). The said parameters are of different order of magnitudes, and therefore an adequate separation of them is highly desirable. Therefore, individual positions are replaced by overall position of the system (of the order of Earth's radius), and by the motion of each bar relative to it (of the order of members dimension), and for modes amplitudes modal equations are used. It should be noted, however, that the above-described motion parameters are redundant, and we must introduce: (a) reactions between members, (b) equations of compatibility of the same number of reactions. In summary, (i) the set of unknowns is: motion parameters, reactions, control forces; (ii) the equations are equilibrium, compatibility, control. Control is introduced by prescribing the motion of some members, produced by control moments of forces. By simple matrix algebra, it is reduced to a system with motion parameters (overall + local) only. (2) In the Lagrangian approach, motion parameters are selected which are already consistent with compatibility conditions. In this case, as customarily, the expression of kinetic, potential, elastic energy is written, and the application of Lagrangian techniques provides directly the solving system. No reactions and compatibility equations appear here, however; for control purpose, prescribed motion law must again be introduced. Comparison of the two approaches shows perfect agreement (as one should have expected), since they are both exact models referring to the same physical system. In general, however, the Eulerian approach lends itself to a better understanding of physical facts, in particular, of the entity of the reactions and of the corresponding structural stresses. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamical systems approach to space environment turbulence
    Chian, ACL
    Borotto, FA
    Rempel, EL
    Macau, EEN
    Rosa, RR
    Christiansen, F
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2003, 107 (1-2) : 447 - 461
  • [42] AN APPROACH TO INVESTIGATE MIXED LUBRICATED SYSTEMS IN THE MICRO SCALE BY MEANS OF THE COUPLED-EULERIAN-LAGRANGIAN METHOD
    Albers, Albert
    Lorentz, Benoit
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE 2010), VOL 9, 2012, : 553 - 561
  • [43] Dynamical Systems Approach to Space Environment Turbulence
    A.C.-L. Chian
    F.A. Borotto
    E.L. Rempel
    E.E.N. Macau
    R.R. Rosa
    F. Christiansen
    Space Science Reviews, 2003, 107 : 447 - 461
  • [44] Statistics vs. dynamics: hints from systems of intermediate fissility
    Vardaci, E.
    Di Nitto, A.
    Nadtochy, P.
    Brondi, A.
    La Rana, G.
    Moro, R.
    Ordine, A.
    Boiano, A.
    Cinausero, M.
    Prete, G.
    Rizzi, V.
    Gelli, N.
    Lucarelli, F.
    Knyazheva, G. N.
    Kozulin, E. M.
    Loktev, T. A.
    Smirnov, S.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON QUASIFISSION PROCESS IN HEAVY ION REACTIONS, 2011, 282
  • [45] MODELING OF CONTROL FORCES FOR KINEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS IN MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMICS - A NEW APPROACH
    IDER, SK
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1991, 38 (04) : 409 - 414
  • [46] A Recursive Driving Constraint Approach for Inverse Dynamics Modeling of Flexible Multibody Systems
    Ebrahimi, Saeed
    Mardani, Arman
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT MULTIBODY SYSTEMS - DYNAMICS, CONTROL, SIMULATION, 2019, 33 : 79 - 98
  • [47] Modeling viscous damping for transverse oscillations in reeving systems using the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Modal approach
    Orzechowski, Grzegorz
    Escalona, Jose L.
    Dmitrochenko, Oleg
    Mohammadi, Narges
    Mikkola, Aki M.
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2022, 534
  • [48] A principled approach to the design of healthcare systems: Autonomy vs. governance
    Taleb-Bendiab, A.
    England, David
    Randles, Martin
    Miseldine, Philip
    Murphy, Karen
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (12) : 1576 - 1585
  • [49] FACTORS OF COMPETITIVENESS VS. LEVEL AND DYNAMICS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE EUROPEAN REGIONAL SPACE
    Sobczak, Elzbieta
    HRADECKE EKONOMICKE DNY 2010, DIL II: EKONOMICKY ROZVOJ A MANAGEMENT REGIONU. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT REGION, 2010, : 95 - 99
  • [50] Dynamics of multibody systems: Generalized mass metric in Riemannian velocity space and recursive momentum formulation
    Zhao, Qiang
    Wu, HongTao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 5, PTS A-C,, 2008, : 633 - 641