Dynamics systems vs. optimal control - a unifying view

被引:178
|
作者
Schaal, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Mohajerian, Peyman [1 ]
Ijspeert, Auke [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] ATR Computat Neuroscience Lab, Kyoto 61902, Japan
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Comp & Commun Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会; 日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
discrete movement; rhythmic movement; movement primitives; dynamic systems; optimization; computational motor control;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65027-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the past, computational motor control has been approached from at least two major frameworks: the dynamic systems approach and the viewpoint of optimal control. The dynamic system approach emphasizes motor control as a process of self-organization between an animal and its environment. Nonlinear differential equations that can model entrainment and synchronization behavior are among the most favorable tools of dynamic systems modelers. In contrast, optimal control approaches view motor control as the evolutionary or development result of a nervous system that tries to optimize rather general organizational principles, e.g., energy consumption or accurate task achievement. Optimal control theory is usually employed to develop appropriate theories. Interestingly, there is rather little interaction between dynamic systems and optimal control modelers as the two approaches follow rather different philosophies and are often viewed as diametrically opposing. In this paper, we develop a computational approach to motor control that offers a unifying modeling framework for both dynamic systems and optimal control approaches. In discussions of several behavioral experiments and some theoretical and robotics studies, we demonstrate how our computational ideas allow both the representation of self-organizing processes and the optimization of movement based on reward criteria. Our modeling framework is rather simple and general, and opens opportunities to revisit many previous modeling results from this novel unifying view.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 445
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local dynamics vs. social mechanisms:: A unifying frame
    Galam, S
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 70 (06): : 705 - 711
  • [2] Resolving actuator redundancy -: optimal control vs. control allocation
    Härkegård, O
    Glad, ST
    AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [3] Synchronization of different-order chaotic systems: Adaptive active vs. optimal control
    Motallebzadeh, Foroogh
    Motlagh, Mohammad Reza Jahed
    Cherati, Zahra Rahmani
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2012, 17 (09) : 3643 - 3657
  • [4] A UNIFYING VIEW OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM DYNAMICS
    BRUMER, P
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 190 (SEP): : 30 - PHS
  • [5] Load balancing vs. distributed rate limiting: an unifying framework for cloud control
    Stanojevic, Rade
    Shorten, Robert
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 1091 - 1096
  • [6] Optimal unemployment insurance: transitional dynamics vs. steady state
    Joseph, G
    Weitzenblum, T
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2003, 6 (04) : 869 - 884
  • [7] Preventive vs. emergency control of power systems
    Wehenkel, L
    Pavella, M
    2004 IEEE PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, VOLS 1 - 3, 2004, : 1665 - 1670
  • [8] Normal vs. optimal
    Elrick, H
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 93 (10) : 410 - 411
  • [9] Distributed vs. Centralized Power Systems Frequency Control
    Andreasson, Martin
    Dimarogonas, Dimos V.
    Johansson, Karl H.
    Sandberg, Henrik
    2013 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2013, : 3524 - 3529
  • [10] Nonlinear control systems modelling: Global vs. local
    Dzielinski, A
    Graniszewski, W
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 : 537 - 542