Dynamics systems vs. optimal control - a unifying view

被引:178
|
作者
Schaal, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Mohajerian, Peyman [1 ]
Ijspeert, Auke [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] ATR Computat Neuroscience Lab, Kyoto 61902, Japan
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Comp & Commun Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会; 日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
discrete movement; rhythmic movement; movement primitives; dynamic systems; optimization; computational motor control;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65027-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the past, computational motor control has been approached from at least two major frameworks: the dynamic systems approach and the viewpoint of optimal control. The dynamic system approach emphasizes motor control as a process of self-organization between an animal and its environment. Nonlinear differential equations that can model entrainment and synchronization behavior are among the most favorable tools of dynamic systems modelers. In contrast, optimal control approaches view motor control as the evolutionary or development result of a nervous system that tries to optimize rather general organizational principles, e.g., energy consumption or accurate task achievement. Optimal control theory is usually employed to develop appropriate theories. Interestingly, there is rather little interaction between dynamic systems and optimal control modelers as the two approaches follow rather different philosophies and are often viewed as diametrically opposing. In this paper, we develop a computational approach to motor control that offers a unifying modeling framework for both dynamic systems and optimal control approaches. In discussions of several behavioral experiments and some theoretical and robotics studies, we demonstrate how our computational ideas allow both the representation of self-organizing processes and the optimization of movement based on reward criteria. Our modeling framework is rather simple and general, and opens opportunities to revisit many previous modeling results from this novel unifying view.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 445
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning the Optimal Control for Evolving Systems with Converging Dynamics
    Liu, Qingsong
    Fang, Zhixuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2024, 8 (02)
  • [32] Time-Optimal Control of Systems with Fractional Dynamics
    Tricaud, Christophe
    Chen, YangQuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 2010, 2010
  • [33] The many-headed hydra of theory vs. the unifying mission of teaching
    Gregory, M
    COLLEGE ENGLISH, 1997, 59 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [34] A unifying methodology for the control of robotic systems
    Peters, J
    Mistry, M
    Udwadia, F
    Cory, R
    Nakanishi, J
    Schaal, S
    2005 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2005, : 3522 - 3529
  • [35] Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view
    Dean, David, Jr.
    Kuhn, Deanna
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 91 (03) : 384 - 397
  • [36] Telcos vs. cable TV: the global view
    Rogers, Curt
    Data Communications, 1995, 24 (13):
  • [37] PATIENTS' VS. PRESCRIBERS' VIEW OF ANTIEPILEPTIC MEDICATION
    Mevag, M. A.
    Landmark, C. J.
    Nakken, K. O.
    Henning, O.
    EPILEPSIA, 2014, 55 : 186 - 186
  • [38] Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics
    Cohen, Ariel
    INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 64 (5-6): : 564 - 592
  • [39] DARK ENERGY VS. DARK MATTER: TOWARDS A UNIFYING SCALAR FIELD?
    Arbey, A.
    CRAL-IPNL: DARK ENERGY AND DARK MATTER: OBSERVATIONS, EXPERIMENTS AND THEORIES, 2009, 36 : 161 - 166
  • [40] Attention vs. precision: latency scheduling for uncertainty resilient control systems
    Aldana-Lopez, Rodrigo
    Aragues, Rosario
    Sagues, Carlos
    2020 59TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2020, : 5697 - 5702