Dynamics systems vs. optimal control - a unifying view

被引:178
|
作者
Schaal, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Mohajerian, Peyman [1 ]
Ijspeert, Auke [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] ATR Computat Neuroscience Lab, Kyoto 61902, Japan
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Comp & Commun Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会; 日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
discrete movement; rhythmic movement; movement primitives; dynamic systems; optimization; computational motor control;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65027-9
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the past, computational motor control has been approached from at least two major frameworks: the dynamic systems approach and the viewpoint of optimal control. The dynamic system approach emphasizes motor control as a process of self-organization between an animal and its environment. Nonlinear differential equations that can model entrainment and synchronization behavior are among the most favorable tools of dynamic systems modelers. In contrast, optimal control approaches view motor control as the evolutionary or development result of a nervous system that tries to optimize rather general organizational principles, e.g., energy consumption or accurate task achievement. Optimal control theory is usually employed to develop appropriate theories. Interestingly, there is rather little interaction between dynamic systems and optimal control modelers as the two approaches follow rather different philosophies and are often viewed as diametrically opposing. In this paper, we develop a computational approach to motor control that offers a unifying modeling framework for both dynamic systems and optimal control approaches. In discussions of several behavioral experiments and some theoretical and robotics studies, we demonstrate how our computational ideas allow both the representation of self-organizing processes and the optimization of movement based on reward criteria. Our modeling framework is rather simple and general, and opens opportunities to revisit many previous modeling results from this novel unifying view.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 445
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamics of multibody systems in space environment; Lagrangian vs. Eulerian approach
    Santini, P
    Gasbarri, P
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2004, 54 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [22] Dynamics of counterpropagating waves in parametrically driven systems: dispersion vs. advection
    Martel, C
    Vega, JM
    Knobloch, E
    PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2003, 174 (1-4) : 198 - 217
  • [23] LOCAL IRBs VS. FEDERAL AGENCIES: SHIFTING DYNAMICS, SYSTEMS, AND RELATIONSHIPS
    Klitzman, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2012, 7 (03) : 50 - 62
  • [24] Parameter accuracy vs. decorrelation in optimal experiment design: a multi-objective point of view
    Telen, Dries
    Logist, Filip
    Van Derlinden, Eva
    Van Impe, Jan F.
    22 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2012, 30 : 827 - 831
  • [25] Case-based recommender systems: A unifying view
    Lorenzi, F
    Ricci, R
    INTELLIGENT TECHNIQUES FOR WEB PERSONALIZATION, 2005, 3169 : 89 - 113
  • [26] Optimal Auctions vs. Anonymous Pricing
    Alaei, Saeed
    Hartline, Jason
    Niazadeh, Rad
    Pountourakis, Emmanouil
    Yuan, Yang
    2015 IEEE 56TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2015, : 1446 - 1463
  • [27] Optimal CPAP: Titration vs. formula
    Gokcebay, N
    Hirshkowitz, M
    SLEEP, 1997, 20 (03) : 237 - 238
  • [28] Optimal auctions vs. anonymous pricing
    Alaei, Saeed
    Hardine, Jason
    Niazadeh, Rad
    Pountourakis, Emmanouil
    Yuan, Yang
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2019, 118 : 494 - 510
  • [29] Ideal inks vs. optimal inks
    Wågberg, J
    2005 Beijing International Conference on Imaging: Technology and Applications for the 21st Century, 2005, : 218 - 219
  • [30] Learning the Optimal Control for Evolving Systems with Converging Dynamics
    Liu Q.
    Fang Z.
    Performance Evaluation Review, 2024, 52 (01): : 29 - 30