Evaluating microalgae-to-energy -systems: different approaches to life cycle assessment (LCA) studies

被引:22
|
作者
Collotta, Massimo [1 ]
Busi, Leonardo [2 ]
Champagne, Pascale [3 ]
Mabee, Warren [4 ]
Tomasoni, Giuseppe [5 ]
Alberti, Marco [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Ind Engn & Management, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[3] Queens Univ, Civil Engn, Chem Engn, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Brescia, Ind Mech Syst Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); microalgae; biodiesel; review; guidelines; biofuel; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; ALGAE; BIOFUELS; CULTIVATION; EXTRACTION; BIOMASS; BALANCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1713
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a valuable tool for determining the environmental impacts associated with different products and has been widely used to assess biofuel production. As a scientific methodology rather than a standardized test, every LCA may be thought of as unique in terms of the selection of functional units or determination of system boundaries. Researchers generally tailor the method to meet the specific goals of their own investigations. This review examines a number of LCAs used to evaluate microalgae-to-energy systems, and evaluates their contributions in terms of their ability to support commercialization efforts in this sector. To this end, a new scoring system for LCAs is proposed based on input/output flows, data origin, production technologies and system boundaries, selection of assumptions and variables, as well as the ability to track environmental, economic, and social impacts. The review suggests that, while a wide variety of new technological pathways for microalgae-to-energy systems are being assessed, the majority of studies reported employ relatively limited system boundaries that may not capture the full impacts of the processes. The number of environmental impact factors being tracked is limited, and many studies do not consider important impacts such as water or land use. Most studies do not incorporate critical information about economics related to new process configurations, which will be essential to support commercialization efforts in this area. (c) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 895
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impacts of energy use in wheat tillage systems: A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study in Iran
    Houshyar, Ehsan
    Grundmann, Philipp
    ENERGY, 2017, 122 : 11 - 24
  • [42] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF FOOD-PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    ANDERSSON, K
    OHLSSON, T
    OLSSON, P
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 5 (05) : 134 - 138
  • [43] Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods
    Cherubini, Edivan
    Franco, Davide
    Zanghelini, Guilherme Marcelo
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (10): : 2055 - 2070
  • [44] Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods
    Edivan Cherubini
    Davide Franco
    Guilherme Marcelo Zanghelini
    Sebastião Roberto Soares
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 2055 - 2070
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction
    Colangelo, Francesco
    Forcina, Antonio
    Farina, Ilenia
    Petrillo, Antonella
    BUILDINGS, 2018, 8 (05)
  • [46] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of passenger seats and their impact on different vehicle models
    Subic, Aleksandar
    Schiavone, Francesco
    Leary, Martin
    Manning, Jack
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2010, 53 (1-2) : 89 - 109
  • [47] Sustainable utilization of crop residues for energy generation: A life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective
    Prasad, Shiv
    Singh, Anoop
    Korres, Nicholas E.
    Rathore, Dheeraj
    Sevda, Surajbhan
    Pant, Deepak
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 303
  • [48] Introduction to evaluating energy justice across the life cycle: A social life cycle assessment approach
    Fortier, Marie-Odile P.
    Teron, Lemir
    Reames, Tony G.
    Munardy, Dynta Trishana
    Sullivan, Breck M.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 : 211 - 219
  • [49] An introduction to the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for sustainable energy and product generation: Relevance and key aspects
    Pant, Deepak
    Singh, Anoop
    Van Bogaert, Gilbert
    Gallego, Yolanda Alvarez
    Diels, Ludo
    Vanbroekhoven, Karolien
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (02): : 1305 - 1313
  • [50] Evaluation of Industrial Urea Energy Consumption (EC) Based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Shi, Longyu
    Liu, Lingyu
    Yang, Bin
    Sheng, Gonghan
    Xu, Tong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)