Evaluating microalgae-to-energy -systems: different approaches to life cycle assessment (LCA) studies

被引:22
|
作者
Collotta, Massimo [1 ]
Busi, Leonardo [2 ]
Champagne, Pascale [3 ]
Mabee, Warren [4 ]
Tomasoni, Giuseppe [5 ]
Alberti, Marco [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Ind Engn & Management, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[3] Queens Univ, Civil Engn, Chem Engn, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Brescia, Ind Mech Syst Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); microalgae; biodiesel; review; guidelines; biofuel; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; ALGAE; BIOFUELS; CULTIVATION; EXTRACTION; BIOMASS; BALANCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1713
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a valuable tool for determining the environmental impacts associated with different products and has been widely used to assess biofuel production. As a scientific methodology rather than a standardized test, every LCA may be thought of as unique in terms of the selection of functional units or determination of system boundaries. Researchers generally tailor the method to meet the specific goals of their own investigations. This review examines a number of LCAs used to evaluate microalgae-to-energy systems, and evaluates their contributions in terms of their ability to support commercialization efforts in this sector. To this end, a new scoring system for LCAs is proposed based on input/output flows, data origin, production technologies and system boundaries, selection of assumptions and variables, as well as the ability to track environmental, economic, and social impacts. The review suggests that, while a wide variety of new technological pathways for microalgae-to-energy systems are being assessed, the majority of studies reported employ relatively limited system boundaries that may not capture the full impacts of the processes. The number of environmental impact factors being tracked is limited, and many studies do not consider important impacts such as water or land use. Most studies do not incorporate critical information about economics related to new process configurations, which will be essential to support commercialization efforts in this area. (c) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 895
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) METHOD IN NUCLEAR ENERGY FIELD: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW
    Zakuciova, K.
    Koci, V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, : 389 - 394
  • [32] Representing crop rotations in life cycle assessment: a review of legume LCA studies
    Marcela Porto Costa
    David Chadwick
    Sophie Saget
    Robert M. Rees
    Michael Williams
    David Styles
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1942 - 1956
  • [33] Overcoming challenges in life cycle assessment of smart energy systems - A map of solution approaches
    Wohlschlager, Daniela
    Bluhm, Hannes
    Beucker, Severin
    Pohl, Johanna
    Froehling, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 423
  • [34] A hybrid life cycle optimization model for different microalgae cultivation systems
    Tan, J.
    Sulaiman, N. M. Nik
    Tan, R. R.
    Aviso, K. B.
    Promentilla, M. A. B.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 299 - 302
  • [35] Status of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Africa
    Karkour, Selim
    Rachid, Safa
    Maaoui, Mariem
    Lin, Chia-Chun
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (02) : 1 - 46
  • [36] Life cycle assessment (LCA) — quo vadis?
    Bradley A. Grimsted
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1997, 2 (1) : 32 - 32
  • [37] Application of life cycle assessment to the LCA case studies single superphosphate production
    Silva, GA
    Kulay, LA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (04): : 209 - 214
  • [38] Representing crop rotations in life cycle assessment: a review of legume LCA studies
    Costa, Marcela Porto
    Chadwick, David
    Saget, Sophie
    Rees, Robert M.
    Williams, Michael
    Styles, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10): : 1942 - 1956
  • [39] Application of life cycle assessment to the LCA case studies single superphosphate production
    G. Anderi Silva
    L. Alexandre Kulay
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 209 - 214
  • [40] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and degradable polymers
    Grant, Tim
    ACS Symposium Series, 2012, 1114 : 45 - 58