Comparison of different trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction

被引：13

作者：

Lüthje, K ^{[1
]}

Hyötyläinen, T ^{[1
]}

Riekkola, ML ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Chem, Analyt Chem Lab, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

来源：

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A | 2004年 / 1025卷 / 01期

关键词：

pressurised hot water extraction; extraction methods; microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction; soil; sediments; environmental analysis; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons;

D O I：

10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.057

中图分类号：

Q5 [生物化学];

学科分类号：

071010 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Four trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction were compared in terms of recovery and selectivity. Also, robustness, repeatability and solvent consumption of the trapping systems were investigated. The trapping methods were collection into solvent following liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase trapping into Tenax TA (SPE), flat sheet microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction and hollow fibre microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were extracted with these systems from four soil and sediment matrices and the extracts were analysed by GC-MS and size-exclusion chromatography. Clear differences were observed in the selectivity and extraction efficiencies of the trapping systems. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：41 / 49

页数：9

共 50 条

[41] Analysis of PAH compounds in soil with on-line coupled pressurised hot water extraction–microporous membrane liquid–liquid extraction–gas chromatography
K. Kuosmanen
T. Hyötyläinen
K. Hartonen
J. Å. Jönsson
M.-L. Riekkola
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 375 : 389 - 399
[42] Application of Different Extraction Methods for the Quality Control of Water
Bogusław Buszewski
Tomasz Ligor
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2001, 129 : 155 - 165
[43] Comparison of cfDNA content in different cancer types with different extraction methods
Zhang, Wenlong
Zhao, Yanan
Li, Jun
Cong, Dan
Zhou, Di
Yang, Yang
Bai, Yuansong
Mu, Tianhao
Liu, Ming
Yin, Yan
Chen, Shifu
Liu, Yuanyuan
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
[44] Application of different extraction methods for the quality control of water
Buszewski, B
Ligor, T
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2001, 129 (1-4): : 155 - 165
[45] The Effect of Temperature on Pressurised Hot Water Extraction of Pharmacologically Important Metabolites as Analysed by UPLC-qTOF-MS and PCA
Khoza, B. S.
Chimuka, L.
Mukwevho, E.
Steenkamp, P. A.
Madala, N. E.
EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
[46] Comparison of different methods for uranium determination in water
Tosheva, Z
Stoyanova, K
Nikolchev, L
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2004, 72 (1-2) : 47 - 55
[47] Comparison of the estimates of the oxalate content of taro leaves and corms and a selection of Indian vegetables following hot water, hot acid and in vitro extraction methods
Savage, G. P.
Martensson, L.
JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2010, 23 (01) : 113 - 117
[48] Oxidative conversion of alkyl naphthalenes to carboxylic acids in hot pressurised water
Martina, A.
Armbruster, U.
Mueller, P.
Deuschle, E.
JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS, 2008, 45 (02): : 220 - 224
[49] COMPARISON OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT TRAPPING METHODS FOR CULICOIDES-VARIIPENNIS (DIPTERA, CERATOPOGONIDAE)
ANDERSON, JR
LINHARES, AX
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 5 (03) : 325 - 334
[50] Comparison of Different Extraction Methods for the Recovery of Olive Leaves Polyphenols
Dobrincic, Ana
Repajic, Maja
Garofulic, Ivona Elez
Tuden, Lucija
Dragovic-Uzelac, Verica
Levaj, Branka
PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (09)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →