Comparison of different trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction

被引:13
|
作者
Lüthje, K [1 ]
Hyötyläinen, T [1 ]
Riekkola, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Chem, Analyt Chem Lab, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
pressurised hot water extraction; extraction methods; microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction; soil; sediments; environmental analysis; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.057
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Four trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction were compared in terms of recovery and selectivity. Also, robustness, repeatability and solvent consumption of the trapping systems were investigated. The trapping methods were collection into solvent following liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase trapping into Tenax TA (SPE), flat sheet microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction and hollow fibre microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were extracted with these systems from four soil and sediment matrices and the extracts were analysed by GC-MS and size-exclusion chromatography. Clear differences were observed in the selectivity and extraction efficiencies of the trapping systems. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Central composite design of pressurised hot water extraction process for extracting capsaicinoids from chili peppers
    Bajer, Tomas
    Bajerova, Petra
    Kremr, Daniel
    Eisner, Ales
    Ventura, Karel
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2015, 40 : 32 - 38
  • [22] Development of pressurised hot water extraction (PHWE) for essential compounds from Moringa oleifera leaf extracts
    Matshediso, Phatsimo G.
    Cukrowska, Ewa
    Chimuka, Luke
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2015, 172 : 423 - 427
  • [23] Stability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pressurised hot water
    Andersson, T
    Hartonen, K
    Hyötyläinen, T
    Riekkola, ML
    ANALYST, 2003, 128 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [24] HOT WATER EXTRACTION PROCESSES - 2 DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHIES
    CORTI, A
    ROETT, F
    CIM BULLETIN, 1987, 80 (902): : 22 - 22
  • [25] A comparison of hot water extraction to standard extraction methods for nitrate, potassium, phosphorus, and sulfate in arid-zone soils
    Hanks, DA
    Webb, BL
    Jolley, VD
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1997, 28 (15-16) : 1393 - 1402
  • [26] Comparison of different methods of Ritz vectors extraction
    Mendrok, K
    Uhl, T
    DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES VI, 2005, 293-294 : 143 - 150
  • [27] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS OF ALTERNARIA ALLERGENS
    PARIS, S
    FITTING, C
    RAMIREZ, E
    LATGE, JP
    DAVID, B
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 85 (05) : 941 - 948
  • [28] COMPARISON OF 3 DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR TURBELLARIA
    MARTENS, PM
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1984, 14 (2-3) : 229 - 234
  • [29] Optimization and comparison of different extraction methods for nitrosamine analysis in drinking water and wastewater.
    Guo, YBC
    Hwang, CJ
    Pastor, SJ
    Barrett, SE
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U1038 - U1038
  • [30] Pressurised water extraction of polyphenols from pomegranate peels
    Cam, Mustafa
    Hisil, Yasar
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 123 (03) : 878 - 885