Comparison of different trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction

被引：13

作者：

Lüthje, K ^{[1
]}

Hyötyläinen, T ^{[1
]}

Riekkola, ML ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Chem, Analyt Chem Lab, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

来源：

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A | 2004年 / 1025卷 / 01期

关键词：

pressurised hot water extraction; extraction methods; microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction; soil; sediments; environmental analysis; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons;

D O I：

10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.057

中图分类号：

Q5 [生物化学];

学科分类号：

071010 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Four trapping methods for pressurised hot water extraction were compared in terms of recovery and selectivity. Also, robustness, repeatability and solvent consumption of the trapping systems were investigated. The trapping methods were collection into solvent following liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase trapping into Tenax TA (SPE), flat sheet microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction and hollow fibre microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were extracted with these systems from four soil and sediment matrices and the extracts were analysed by GC-MS and size-exclusion chromatography. Clear differences were observed in the selectivity and extraction efficiencies of the trapping systems. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：41 / 49

页数：9

共 50 条

[31] A COMPARISON OF TRAPPING METHODS
MANVILLE, RH
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1950, 31 (04) : 377 - 383
[32] Characterisation of Norway spruce hemicelluloses extracted by pressurised hot-water extraction (ASE) in the presence of sodium bicarbonate
Song, Tao
Pranovich, Andrey
Holmbom, Bjarne
HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2011, 65 (01) : 35 - 42
[33] Extraction and characterization of pectic polysaccharides from Choerospondias axillaris peels: Comparison of hot water and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods
Wang, Chao
Li, Jing
Cao, Yi
Huang, Jialu
Lin, Hongyi
Zhao, Tiantian
Liu, Lu
Shen, Peiyi
McClements, David Julian
Chen, Jun
Liu, Chengmei
Liu, Jiyan
Li, Qian
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2023, 401
[34] Pressurised Hot Water as a Novel Extractant of Natural Products: A Review
Mukhopadhyay, Mamata
Panja, Palash
INDIAN CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 2010, 51 (04) : 311 - 324
[35] Current use of pressurised liquid extraction and subcritical water extraction in environmental analysis
Ramos, L
Kristenson, EM
Brinkman, UAT
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 975 (01) : 3 - 29
[36] Comparison of different extraction methods for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Llobregat (Barcelona) river water
Valero, F
Carnicero, M
QUIMICA ANALITICA, 1996, 15 (01): : 64 - 67
[37] Comparison of different methods for total bacteria RNA extraction
Luo, L.-X., 1948, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China (29):
[38] Comparison of different methods for the extraction of cannabinoids from cannabis
De Vita, Daniela
Madia, Valentina Noemi
Tudino, Valeria
Saccoliti, Francesco
De Leo, Alessandro
Messore, Antonella
Roscilli, Patrizia
Botto, Alfonso
Pindinello, Ivano
Santilli, Gianluigi
Scipione, Luigi
Costi, Roberta
Di Santo, Roberto
NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (20) : 2952 - 2958
[39] Phosphorus in archaeological soil: comparison of different extraction methods
Selskiene, Ausra
Simniskyte-Strimaitiene, Andra
Vaiciuniene, Jurate
Pakstas, Vidas
Karpaviciene, Violeta
Giraitis, Raimondas
CHEMIJA, 2017, 28 (03): : 160 - 171
[40] Comparison of different methods of extraction for incurred contaminants in fish
Sapozhnikova, Yelena
Lehotay, Steven J.
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248

← 1 2 3 4 5 →