Differences between hatchery-raised and wild blue crabs: Implications for stock enhancement potential

被引:54
|
作者
Davis, JLD
Young-Williams, AC
Aguilar, R
Carswell, BL
Goodison, MR
Hines, AH
Kramer, MA
Zohar, Y
Zmora, O
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD 20137 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Inst Biotechnol, Ctr Marine Biotechnol, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1577/T03-004
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Stock enhancement of severely exploited, recruitment-limited fisheries has been controversial for several reasons, one of which is the lack of information about competency, competitiveness, and survivorship of hatchery-reared individuals released into the field. Because enhancement efforts have focused on finfish, even less information is available with which to assess enhancement potential of crustaceans. The Chesapeake Bay stock of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus has declined by more than 80% over the past 12 years and has exhibited recruitment limitation, leading to recent efforts to study the potential of enhancing populations with hatchery-reared juveniles. To assess how hatchery-raised juvenile blue crabs may fare after release into the Chesapeake Bay, we compared several aspects of hatchery and wild crabs. Hatchery crabs readily fed on natural prey, moved in the field similarly to wild crabs, and grew at rates similar to those of wild crabs; however, the two crab groups differed in other factors important to field survival. Prerelease and laboratory-held hatchery crabs had different carapace morphology (smaller spines) than wild crabs, though spine lengths increased to normal proportions by several weeks after release. Hatchery crabs did not initially bury in sediment as often as wild crabs, suggesting inexperience with an important predator escape response. Hatchery crabs were also,preyed upon at higher rates in the field than wild crabs. Conditioning experiments suggest that inexperience with sediment and low burial rates were not the main cause of higher predation. By identifying areas in which hatchery individuals may be relatively weak and deficits that can potentially be mitigated, studies such as this can lead to improving the success of hatchery-raised individuals in the held. On a broader scale, such studies also contribute to determining whether stock enhancement is possible in the case of the Chesapeake blue crab.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genetic population structure in flatfishes and potential impact of aquaculture and stock enhancement on wild populations in Europe
    Delphine Danancher
    Eva Garcia-Vazquez
    Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2011, 21 : 441 - 462
  • [42] Genetic differences between wild and hatchery populations of Diplodus sargus and D-vulgaris inferred from RAPD markers: implications for production and restocking programs design
    Pereira, J. C.
    Lino, P. G.
    Leitao, A.
    Joaquim, S.
    Chaves, R.
    Pousao-Ferreira, P.
    Guedes-Pinto, H.
    dos Santos, M. Neves
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GENETICS, 2010, 51 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [43] Genetic differences between wild and hatchery populations ofDiplodus sargus andD. vulgaris inferred from RAPD markers: implications for production and restocking programs design
    J. C. Pereira
    P. G. Lino
    A. Leitão
    S. Joaquim
    R. Chaves
    P. Pousãao-Ferreira
    H. Guedes-Pinto
    M. Neves dos Santos
    Journal of Applied Genetics, 2010, 51 : 67 - 72
  • [44] DIFFERENCES IN LIFE-HISTORY AND MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR BETWEEN WILD AND HATCHERY-REARED ATLANTIC SALMON IN NATURE
    JONSSON, B
    JONSSON, N
    HANSEN, LP
    AQUACULTURE, 1991, 98 (1-3) : 69 - 78
  • [45] Genetic differences between wild and hatchery populations of red sea cucumber (Stichopus japonicus) inferred from microsatellite markers: implications for production and stocking programs design
    Hye Suck An
    Jang Wook Lee
    Seong Wan Hong
    Ha Neui Hong
    Jung Youn Park
    Jeong In Myeong
    Chul Min An
    Genes & Genomics, 2013, 35 : 709 - 717
  • [46] Genetic differences between wild and hatchery populations of red sea cucumber (Stichopus japonicus) inferred from microsatellite markers: implications for production and stocking programs design
    An, Hye Suck
    Lee, Jang Wook
    Hong, Seong Wan
    Hong, Ha Neui
    Park, Jung Youn
    Myeong, Jeong In
    An, Chul Min
    GENES & GENOMICS, 2013, 35 (06) : 709 - 717
  • [47] Morphological differences between wild and hatchery-reared Bloater (Coregonus hoyi) from Lake Michigan, USA
    Honsey, Andrew E.
    Kao, Yu-Chun
    Olds, Chris
    Bunnell, David B.
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [48] Stable Isotopes of Carbon and Nitrogen Indicate Differences in Marine Ecology between Wild and Hatchery-Produced Steelhead
    Quinn, Thomas P.
    Seamons, Todd R.
    Johnson, Susan P.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2012, 141 (02) : 526 - 532
  • [49] Using experimental ecology to understand stock enhancement: Comparisons of habitat-related predation on wild and hatchery-reared Penaeus plebejus Hess
    Ochwada-Doyle, Faith
    Gray, Charles A.
    Loneragan, Neil R.
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2010, 390 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [50] Eastern king prawn Penaeus plebejus stock enhancement-Genetic evidence that hatchery bred prawns have survived in the wild after release
    Premachandra, H. K. A.
    Becker, Alistair
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    Knibb, Wayne
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13