Differences between hatchery-raised and wild blue crabs: Implications for stock enhancement potential

被引:54
|
作者
Davis, JLD
Young-Williams, AC
Aguilar, R
Carswell, BL
Goodison, MR
Hines, AH
Kramer, MA
Zohar, Y
Zmora, O
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD 20137 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Inst Biotechnol, Ctr Marine Biotechnol, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1577/T03-004
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Stock enhancement of severely exploited, recruitment-limited fisheries has been controversial for several reasons, one of which is the lack of information about competency, competitiveness, and survivorship of hatchery-reared individuals released into the field. Because enhancement efforts have focused on finfish, even less information is available with which to assess enhancement potential of crustaceans. The Chesapeake Bay stock of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus has declined by more than 80% over the past 12 years and has exhibited recruitment limitation, leading to recent efforts to study the potential of enhancing populations with hatchery-reared juveniles. To assess how hatchery-raised juvenile blue crabs may fare after release into the Chesapeake Bay, we compared several aspects of hatchery and wild crabs. Hatchery crabs readily fed on natural prey, moved in the field similarly to wild crabs, and grew at rates similar to those of wild crabs; however, the two crab groups differed in other factors important to field survival. Prerelease and laboratory-held hatchery crabs had different carapace morphology (smaller spines) than wild crabs, though spine lengths increased to normal proportions by several weeks after release. Hatchery crabs did not initially bury in sediment as often as wild crabs, suggesting inexperience with an important predator escape response. Hatchery crabs were also,preyed upon at higher rates in the field than wild crabs. Conditioning experiments suggest that inexperience with sediment and low burial rates were not the main cause of higher predation. By identifying areas in which hatchery individuals may be relatively weak and deficits that can potentially be mitigated, studies such as this can lead to improving the success of hatchery-raised individuals in the held. On a broader scale, such studies also contribute to determining whether stock enhancement is possible in the case of the Chesapeake blue crab.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differences in oxygen and carbon stable isotope ratios between hatchery and wild pink salmon fry
    Tomida, Yasuo
    Suzuki, Toshiya
    Yamada, Tsutomu
    Asami, Ryuji
    Yaegashi, Hirofumi
    Iryu, Yasufumi
    Otake, Tsuguo
    FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2014, 80 (02) : 273 - 280
  • [32] Differences in oxygen and carbon stable isotope ratios between hatchery and wild pink salmon fry
    Yasuo Tomida
    Toshiya Suzuki
    Tsutomu Yamada
    Ryuji Asami
    Hirofumi Yaegashi
    Yasufumi Iryu
    Tsuguo Otake
    Fisheries Science, 2014, 80 : 273 - 280
  • [33] Sex reversal, selection against hatchery females or wild males does not explain differences in sex ratio between first generation hatchery and wild steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Neil F. Thompson
    Kathleen S. Cole
    Laura A. McMahon
    Melanie L. Marine
    Lyle D. Curtis
    Michael S. Blouin
    Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2015, 98 : 113 - 120
  • [34] Release strategies for estuarine species with complex migratory life cycles:: Stock enhancement of Chesapeake blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus)
    Hines, Anson H.
    Johnson, Eric G.
    Young, Alicia C.
    Aguilar, Robert
    Kramer, Margaret A.
    Goodison, Michael
    Zmora, Oded
    Zohar, Yonathan
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2008, 16 (1-3): : 175 - 185
  • [35] Sex reversal, selection against hatchery females or wild males does not explain differences in sex ratio between first generation hatchery and wild steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Thompson, Neil F.
    Cole, Kathleen S.
    McMahon, Laura A.
    Marine, Melanie L.
    Curtis, Lyle D.
    Blouin, Michael S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2015, 98 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [36] Microsatellite DNA markers: evaluating their potential for estimating the proportion of hatchery-reared offspring in a stock enhancement programme
    Bravington, MV
    Ward, RD
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (05) : 1287 - 1297
  • [37] Assessing the potential for stock enhancement in the case of the Chesapeake Bay blue crab (Callinectes sapidus)
    Davis, JLD
    Young-Williams, AC
    Hines, AH
    Zohar, Y
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2005, 62 (01) : 109 - 122
  • [38] Differences in the pattern of antipredator behaviour between hatchery-reared and wild European sea bass juveniles
    Malavasi, S
    Georgalas, V
    Lugli, M
    Torricelli, P
    Mainardi, D
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2004, 65 : 143 - 155
  • [39] DIFFERENCES IN OTOLITH MICROSTRUCTURE BETWEEN HATCHERY-REARED AND WILD CHINOOK SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS-TSHAWYTSCHA)
    ZHANG, Z
    BEAMISH, RJ
    RIDDELL, BE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1995, 52 (02) : 344 - 352
  • [40] Genetic population structure in flatfishes and potential impact of aquaculture and stock enhancement on wild populations in Europe
    Danancher, Delphine
    Garcia-Vazquez, Eva
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2011, 21 (03) : 441 - 462